Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56371 - 56380 of 64836 for timed.

COURT OF APPEALS
not know or understand the nature of a jury trial at the time of the plea. ¶3 To withdraw a guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29632 - 2007-07-16

[PDF] Jesus Barbary v. James R. Sturm
of the statute, the order is affirmed. BACKGROUND Barbary began working as a full-time custodian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10989 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Donald A. Lesavage
to make that motion. Either way, his attorney would have been present two times, and would have billed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15410 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
at the time of the interview) cuts against admissibility. Though the victim was “old enough to understand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943547 - 2025-04-23

James Robleski v. Vernon Moore
the issue of privity. We disagree. The court effectively considered privity by saying that at no time were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2851 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CV-804; Information for Respondents Regarding the Surrender and Return of Firearms
and set up a time for firearm surrender.  The sheriff will fill out a receipt for each firearm
/formdisplay/CV-804_instructions.pdf?formNumber=CV-804&formType=Instructions&formatId=2&language=en - 2023-01-04

[PDF] Arthur Robert Petrie v. Board of Bar Examiners
or provisionally approved by the American bar association at the time of the applicant’s graduation shall
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17297 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Kevin B. v. Michael W.E.
had once been evicted from an apartment and that there were times his apartment was sufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13220 - 2017-09-21

John J. Surinak v. John Kaishian
an ownership interest in the land at the time it became contaminated; and (2) the undisputed facts established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12248 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the time for a direct appeal has passed. See State v. Henley, 2010 WI 97, ¶50, 328 Wis. 2d 544, 787 N.W
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010504 - 2025-09-17