Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56391 - 56400 of 61946 for judgment.
Search results 56391 - 56400 of 61946 for judgment.
State v. Karen A.O.
a judgment." Fleischacker v. State Farm Mut'l Auto. Ins. Co., 274 Wis. at 218, 79 N.W.2d at 819 (emphasis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9933 - 2005-03-31
a judgment." Fleischacker v. State Farm Mut'l Auto. Ins. Co., 274 Wis. at 218, 79 N.W.2d at 819 (emphasis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9933 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mary P. Donovan
failed to appear for a trial date, a default forfeiture judgment was ordered in the amount of $209.50
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17279 - 2005-03-31
failed to appear for a trial date, a default forfeiture judgment was ordered in the amount of $209.50
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17279 - 2005-03-31
Donald J. Harman v.
, the court granted the motion to dismiss and entered judgment for the defendants with prejudice and costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17255 - 2005-03-31
, the court granted the motion to dismiss and entered judgment for the defendants with prejudice and costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17255 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed the judgment of conviction and the postconviction order on direct appeal. See State v. Cucuta
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43255 - 2013-01-16
affirmed the judgment of conviction and the postconviction order on direct appeal. See State v. Cucuta
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43255 - 2013-01-16
CA Blank Order
for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111233 - 2014-04-28
for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111233 - 2014-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed Coleman’s judgment of conviction in December 1993. ¶4 Coleman took no further action until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49839 - 2010-05-10
affirmed Coleman’s judgment of conviction in December 1993. ¶4 Coleman took no further action until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49839 - 2010-05-10
COURT OF APPEALS
permission, while Berg remained in Colorado. Corddry docketed the parties’ Colorado divorce judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76403 - 2012-01-17
permission, while Berg remained in Colorado. Corddry docketed the parties’ Colorado divorce judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76403 - 2012-01-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to appear at scheduled hearings or face possible default judgment. At the postdisposition hearing, E.R.T.’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173828 - 2017-09-21
to appear at scheduled hearings or face possible default judgment. At the postdisposition hearing, E.R.T.’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173828 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for postconviction relief from a judgment of conviction entered in 2015. Olson contends that he was sentenced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606061 - 2022-12-29
for postconviction relief from a judgment of conviction entered in 2015. Olson contends that he was sentenced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606061 - 2022-12-29
[PDF]
Leslie J. Schatz v. Gary R. McCaughtry
action was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3364 - 2017-09-19
action was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3364 - 2017-09-19