Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5641 - 5650 of 16451 for commentating.
Search results 5641 - 5650 of 16451 for commentating.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the defendant had finished speaking. In any event, the court stated that none of the additional comments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102628 - 2017-09-21
that the defendant had finished speaking. In any event, the court stated that none of the additional comments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102628 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court’s comments at the sentencing hearing demonstrate it believed the guidelines were meaningless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93402 - 2013-03-04
. The court’s comments at the sentencing hearing demonstrate it believed the guidelines were meaningless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93402 - 2013-03-04
Karen Wisemiller v. Kenneth Wisemiller
that these two individuals bring to the court as a result of the marriage.” That brief comment does not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16229 - 2005-03-31
that these two individuals bring to the court as a result of the marriage.” That brief comment does not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16229 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Laron J. Williamson
supervision. During the sentencing hearing, the court commented that the legislature considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4488 - 2017-09-19
supervision. During the sentencing hearing, the court commented that the legislature considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4488 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jamal R. Jackson
—does not believe the program suitable. Taken in context, the court’s comment was a consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12772 - 2005-03-31
—does not believe the program suitable. Taken in context, the court’s comment was a consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12772 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
and disparaging comments about a judge, and attempting to exert improper influence on a judge. Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742066 - 2023-12-15
and disparaging comments about a judge, and attempting to exert improper influence on a judge. Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742066 - 2023-12-15
CA Blank Order
in its comments, focusing instead on Knoebel’s repeated conduct as it related to driving under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135463 - 2015-02-24
in its comments, focusing instead on Knoebel’s repeated conduct as it related to driving under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135463 - 2015-02-24
COURT OF APPEALS
wrong but does not go the right way....” At the sentencing hearing, the court commented: His own dad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68176 - 2011-07-18
wrong but does not go the right way....” At the sentencing hearing, the court commented: His own dad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68176 - 2011-07-18
State v. Romel Anton Taylor
uncertainty about the exact date on which the Notice was filed. Taylor comments, therefore, that “[t]his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10884 - 2005-03-31
uncertainty about the exact date on which the Notice was filed. Taylor comments, therefore, that “[t]his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10884 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles R. Wincek
. The trial court’s comments at sentencing plainly indicate that the court believed that some time served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10692 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court’s comments at sentencing plainly indicate that the court believed that some time served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10692 - 2005-03-31