Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5641 - 5650 of 68566 for did.
Search results 5641 - 5650 of 68566 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
contends that the evidence did not support the jury’s finding that his victim did not consent to sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29943 - 2014-09-15
contends that the evidence did not support the jury’s finding that his victim did not consent to sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29943 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Phillip K. Adams
because the trial court did not establish an adequate factual basis for conviction before accepting his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10118 - 2017-09-19
because the trial court did not establish an adequate factual basis for conviction before accepting his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10118 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Daniel L. Hanson
representation because Ribbens did not adequately consider presenting a necessity defense. Hanson testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4806 - 2017-09-20
representation because Ribbens did not adequately consider presenting a necessity defense. Hanson testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4806 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Hudson Diesel v. Rose Ottum
notified Hudson Diesel that its counsel recommended against the waiver, but the board did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7175 - 2017-09-20
notified Hudson Diesel that its counsel recommended against the waiver, but the board did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7175 - 2017-09-20
State v. Rick A. Knutson
that the officer did not have a reasonable suspicion to believe that he was committing an offense. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10975 - 2005-03-31
that the officer did not have a reasonable suspicion to believe that he was committing an offense. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10975 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
did not support the jury’s finding that his victim did not consent to sexual intercourse with him. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29943 - 2008-01-29
did not support the jury’s finding that his victim did not consent to sexual intercourse with him. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29943 - 2008-01-29
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion or on direct appeal, and Bunch did not present a sufficient reason for failing to raise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96114 - 2013-04-30
postconviction motion or on direct appeal, and Bunch did not present a sufficient reason for failing to raise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96114 - 2013-04-30
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. NOT PARTICIPATING: HAGEDORN, J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS: 2 For the defendants
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254062 - 2020-04-07
. NOT PARTICIPATING: HAGEDORN, J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS: 2 For the defendants
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254062 - 2020-04-07
Frontsheet
., Bradley, J., concur (Opinion filed). Dissented: Not Participating: Prosser, J., did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94150 - 2013-05-05
., Bradley, J., concur (Opinion filed). Dissented: Not Participating: Prosser, J., did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94150 - 2013-05-05
State v. Obea S. Hayes
of conviction, concluding that the defendant did not have to raise a challenge to the sufficiency
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16635 - 2005-03-31
of conviction, concluding that the defendant did not have to raise a challenge to the sufficiency
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16635 - 2005-03-31