Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5641 - 5650 of 57196 for id.

[PDF] State v. Tavares James Rosemond
must be followed unless the evidence was incredible as a matter of law. Id. at 377. “[I]f any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21564 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
factor exists. Id., ¶36. Second, the defendant must show that the new factor justifies sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133571 - 2015-01-27

State v. Gerald C. McConnell
protection against multiple punishments for the same offense. Id. at ¶4. Instead, McConnell argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4381 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Richard T. Harder
to protect the public. Id. at 264. A circuit court misuses its discretion if it “gives too much weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5405 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
limits. Id., ¶22. In making the reconfinement decision, the circuit court should consider the nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34837 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
limits. Id., ¶22. In making the reconfinement decision, the circuit court should consider the nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34837 - 2008-12-08

COURT OF APPEALS
for use at a later trial.” Id. ¶4 After the parties completed briefing in this case, the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28734 - 2007-04-16

[PDF] CA Blank Order
it, applied the proper legal standards, and reached a reasonable conclusion. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218786 - 2018-09-12

[PDF] State v. Gerald C. McConnell
for the same offense. Id. at ¶4. Instead, McConnell argues that the arguments in Raddeman were premised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4381 - 2017-09-19

State v. Richard A. Hallada
cause. See id. at 622. Whether field sobriety tests are necessary will depend on the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21435 - 2006-02-21