Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5641 - 5650 of 17143 for probate/1000.
Search results 5641 - 5650 of 17143 for probate/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
and placed Rivera on probation. The court’s oral pronouncement included its order that “[y]ou have to give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30659 - 2007-10-22
and placed Rivera on probation. The court’s oral pronouncement included its order that “[y]ou have to give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30659 - 2007-10-22
[PDF]
State v. Larry Anderson
the defendant to pay a $250 reimbursement, “as a term and condition of probation,” for the cost of genetic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3843 - 2017-09-20
the defendant to pay a $250 reimbursement, “as a term and condition of probation,” for the cost of genetic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3843 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
. At the time, Sullivan was on probation for another conviction for similar acts involving the same victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38005 - 2014-09-15
. At the time, Sullivan was on probation for another conviction for similar acts involving the same victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38005 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
probation would not be revoked in a separate case, but his probation was later revoked, impacting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=652078 - 2023-05-04
probation would not be revoked in a separate case, but his probation was later revoked, impacting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=652078 - 2023-05-04
Joseph Stinson v. Kenneth Morgan
the revocation of his probation was a prisoner under the PLRA. First, we concluded that, although Marth’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14642 - 2005-03-31
the revocation of his probation was a prisoner under the PLRA. First, we concluded that, although Marth’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14642 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and placed Rivera on probation. The court’s oral pronouncement included its order that “[y]ou have to give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30659 - 2014-09-15
and placed Rivera on probation. The court’s oral pronouncement included its order that “[y]ou have to give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30659 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
undermine her arguments. [2] Katherine also notes that the court rejected probation in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60274 - 2011-02-22
undermine her arguments. [2] Katherine also notes that the court rejected probation in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60274 - 2011-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
in exchange for a recommendation of three years of probation and sixty days in jail. Id., ¶24. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95750 - 2013-04-23
in exchange for a recommendation of three years of probation and sixty days in jail. Id., ¶24. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95750 - 2013-04-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
agreement, the State recommended that the court impose four years of probation, with a total of two years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572209 - 2022-10-04
agreement, the State recommended that the court impose four years of probation, with a total of two years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572209 - 2022-10-04
[PDF]
State v. Amanda L. Gear
the proceedings ruled out probation in the court’s view. Consequently, the trial court imposed concurrent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6275 - 2017-09-19
the proceedings ruled out probation in the court’s view. Consequently, the trial court imposed concurrent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6275 - 2017-09-19