Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5641 - 5650 of 12895 for se.
Search results 5641 - 5650 of 12895 for se.
State v. Jesse Franklin
. DiMOTTO, Judges. Affirmed. ¶1 SCHUDSON, J.[1] Jesse Franklin, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15280 - 2005-03-31
. DiMOTTO, Judges. Affirmed. ¶1 SCHUDSON, J.[1] Jesse Franklin, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15280 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Kevin Flowers, pro se, appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174961 - 2017-09-21
. Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Kevin Flowers, pro se, appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174961 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Brennan, JJ. Larry N. Scruggs, Jr., pro se, appeals a trial court order entered on June 1, 2015
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165252 - 2017-09-21
and Brennan, JJ. Larry N. Scruggs, Jr., pro se, appeals a trial court order entered on June 1, 2015
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165252 - 2017-09-21
State v. Esteban Martinez
to appeal his conviction and was appointed a state public defender.[4] Martinez' pro se motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8271 - 2005-03-31
to appeal his conviction and was appointed a state public defender.[4] Martinez' pro se motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8271 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for Outagamie County: DEE R. DYER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 MANGERSON, J.[1] Thaddeus Lietz, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112719 - 2014-05-19
for Outagamie County: DEE R. DYER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 MANGERSON, J.[1] Thaddeus Lietz, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112719 - 2014-05-19
State v. Daniel Berndt
., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Daniel Berndt, pro se, appeals an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5863 - 2005-03-31
., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Daniel Berndt, pro se, appeals an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5863 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
PER CURIAM. Daniel Aguilar appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31017 - 2014-09-15
PER CURIAM. Daniel Aguilar appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31017 - 2014-09-15
State v. Montgomery P. Avant
and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Montgomery Avant, pro se, appeals the order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6224 - 2005-03-31
and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Montgomery Avant, pro se, appeals the order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6224 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 69
.” Schultz, 249 Wis. 2d 722, ¶30. The trend continued when our supreme court rejected per se exclusions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82553 - 2014-09-15
.” Schultz, 249 Wis. 2d 722, ¶30. The trend continued when our supreme court rejected per se exclusions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82553 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
se, why they had not discussed multiplicity, counsel testified: It was a negotiated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141601 - 2017-09-21
se, why they had not discussed multiplicity, counsel testified: It was a negotiated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141601 - 2017-09-21