Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5641 - 5650 of 84717 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 5641 - 5650 of 84717 for simple case search/1000.
2008 WI APP 136
of the search. See id., ¶61. ¶21 The facts of this case contrast with those of Trecroci and more closely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33680 - 2008-09-23
of the search. See id., ¶61. ¶21 The facts of this case contrast with those of Trecroci and more closely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33680 - 2008-09-23
[PDF]
State v. Brian J. Lewandoske
to § 161.41(1m)(h)1, STATS. On appeal, Lewandoske challenges the issuance and execution of the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8291 - 2017-09-19
to § 161.41(1m)(h)1, STATS. On appeal, Lewandoske challenges the issuance and execution of the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8291 - 2017-09-19
State v. Brian J. Lewandoske
for the search warrant was based was stale. Based upon our review of the circumstances of this case, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8291 - 2005-03-31
for the search warrant was based was stale. Based upon our review of the circumstances of this case, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8291 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. In Schmerber, the Court noted that, generally, a warrant is not needed to conduct a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133555 - 2017-09-21
in this case. In Schmerber, the Court noted that, generally, a warrant is not needed to conduct a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133555 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the searches in Schmerber and Winston, the genital swabs in this case did not intrude beneath the surface
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133555 - 2015-01-26
the searches in Schmerber and Winston, the genital swabs in this case did not intrude beneath the surface
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133555 - 2015-01-26
Float-Rite Park, Inc. v. Village of Somerset
2001 WI App 113 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2699 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 113 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2699 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Float-Rite Park, Inc. v. Village of Somerset
2001 WI App 113 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2699 - 2017-09-19
2001 WI App 113 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2699 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
to Moore's case, I conclude that the officers lacked probable cause to arrest, and therefore to search
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669658 - 2023-06-21
to Moore's case, I conclude that the officers lacked probable cause to arrest, and therefore to search
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669658 - 2023-06-21
[PDF]
State v. Peter J. Bartram
the no-knock execution of a search warrant was unlawful. We conclude that part of Bartram’s argument is made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15864 - 2017-09-21
the no-knock execution of a search warrant was unlawful. We conclude that part of Bartram’s argument is made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15864 - 2017-09-21
State v. Peter J. Bartram
substance. The issue is whether the no-knock execution of a search warrant was unlawful. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15864 - 2013-10-24
substance. The issue is whether the no-knock execution of a search warrant was unlawful. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15864 - 2013-10-24