Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5641 - 5650 of 58531 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
and an order denying her postconviction motion seeking a new trial on the grounds of newly discovered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27996 - 2007-02-05

[PDF] State v. Antonio V. Henderson
to institutional care for three years and six months. Henderson claims that the trial court lacked jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14979 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Santos Sanchez
to § 940.01(1), STATS. He claims (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12372 - 2017-09-21

State v. Robert Harris
. On January 22, 1998, in a nonfinal order, the trial court held the new roof deck to be a capital improvement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14385 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Douglas R. Pedersen
, contrary to § 946.42(3)(a), STATS. The trial court imposed a four-year sentence. The no merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7931 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
the trial court erred in denying his motion and argues that his motion was actually a motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28147 - 2014-09-15

State v. Toby J. Vandenberg
. VanDenBerg contends the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by imposing an excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13503 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Dean Heike v. Dan Hawk
. Dan Hawk appeals from an order denying his motion and demand for a new trial. Hawk argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15153 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Robert Harris
a permit. On January 22, 1998, in a nonfinal order, the trial court held the new roof deck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14385 - 2014-09-15

State v. Antonio V. Henderson
that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to commit him because the time limits in § 971.17(3)(e), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14979 - 2005-03-31