Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56401 - 56410 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 56401 - 56410 of 83389 for simple case search.
Geraldine L. Roettger v. Donald H. Roettger
year before the marriage, in violation of case law and the Marital Property Act; and (2) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13272 - 2005-03-31
year before the marriage, in violation of case law and the Marital Property Act; and (2) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13272 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Board of Attorney Professional Responsibility v. Harold E. Krause, Jr.
2000 WI 114 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 00-0992-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16375 - 2017-09-21
2000 WI 114 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 00-0992-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16375 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Rule Order
the complaint and stipulation without the appointment of a referee., in which case the supreme court may
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116485 - 2017-09-21
the complaint and stipulation without the appointment of a referee., in which case the supreme court may
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116485 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael E. Carter
proceedings as at probation or parole revocation proceedings). Although there is no Wisconsin case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7038 - 2017-09-20
proceedings as at probation or parole revocation proceedings). Although there is no Wisconsin case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7038 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Jo Anne M.(Holl) Kline v. Ralph A. Kloehn, M.D.
judgment dismissing the case because it concluded that the statute of limitations had expired. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9370 - 2017-09-19
judgment dismissing the case because it concluded that the statute of limitations had expired. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9370 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
-57. Neither circumstance was present in this case. Neither the State nor Salvi had a legal duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35192 - 2009-01-14
-57. Neither circumstance was present in this case. Neither the State nor Salvi had a legal duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35192 - 2009-01-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2019AP85 2 this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257785 - 2020-04-21
. No. 2019AP85 2 this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257785 - 2020-04-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
is generally not significant.” Id. (citation omitted). ¶5 In this case, we conclude that Grady did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26755 - 2014-09-15
is generally not significant.” Id. (citation omitted). ¶5 In this case, we conclude that Grady did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26755 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. No. 2019AP539-CRNM 2 RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251074 - 2019-12-05
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. No. 2019AP539-CRNM 2 RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251074 - 2019-12-05
[PDF]
State v. Patrick T. Roberts
that the sentences were impermissibly disparate. Perez, 170 Wis.2d at 144, 487 N.W.2d at 635. Leniency in one case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9605 - 2017-09-19
that the sentences were impermissibly disparate. Perez, 170 Wis.2d at 144, 487 N.W.2d at 635. Leniency in one case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9605 - 2017-09-19