Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56471 - 56480 of 83656 for case search.
Search results 56471 - 56480 of 83656 for case search.
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137519 - 2015-03-11
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137519 - 2015-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
, it was not always possible to match an examinee with a subgroup when applying the Static-99R. However, in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91734 - 2013-01-22
, it was not always possible to match an examinee with a subgroup when applying the Static-99R. However, in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91734 - 2013-01-22
James A. Shives v. William L. Powell
for the proposition that an altered road is not discontinued. ¶14 In the present case, when Old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2600 - 2005-03-31
for the proposition that an altered road is not discontinued. ¶14 In the present case, when Old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2600 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133858 - 2015-02-03
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133858 - 2015-02-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
claim and no indication the Langreders would file one. Standard of Review ¶10 In this case, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27054 - 2006-11-06
claim and no indication the Langreders would file one. Standard of Review ¶10 In this case, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27054 - 2006-11-06
[PDF]
James A. Shives v. William L. Powell
In the present case, when Old Whistler Road was discontinued, no one was living on the road. The people who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2600 - 2017-09-19
In the present case, when Old Whistler Road was discontinued, no one was living on the road. The people who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2600 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, I reject Owens’ arguments and affirm. Background ¶2 This case presents an unusual fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191677 - 2017-09-21
, I reject Owens’ arguments and affirm. Background ¶2 This case presents an unusual fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191677 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John C. Vang
court sentencing. The court of appeals, however, is constrained to follow established case law. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4400 - 2017-09-19
court sentencing. The court of appeals, however, is constrained to follow established case law. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4400 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kareem Q. Curry
. Such is the case here. ¶8 Curry’s third contention is that the trial court gave erroneous and confusing jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6742 - 2017-09-20
. Such is the case here. ¶8 Curry’s third contention is that the trial court gave erroneous and confusing jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6742 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. Rutzinski, 2001 WI 22, 241 Wis. 2d 729, 623 N.W.2d 516, the circuit court reasoned: In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66905 - 2011-07-05
. Rutzinski, 2001 WI 22, 241 Wis. 2d 729, 623 N.W.2d 516, the circuit court reasoned: In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66905 - 2011-07-05