Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56481 - 56490 of 59511 for quit claim deed.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
claims that an acquaintance of his, W.S., committed these crimes.8 Kuehn further contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272877 - 2020-07-28

State v. John C. Setagord
at 125. We did not decide the validity of that claim because the trial court had not attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8543 - 2005-03-31

WI App 69 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2013 Complete Title of...
would have been Sunday, April 1), the Department would be willing to eliminate its overpayment claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112243 - 2014-06-24

Eau Claire County v. General Teamsters Union Local No. 662
this bill, the Union claims, was an affirmation of the legislature's intent that a county law-enforcement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17454 - 2005-03-31

Michael J. Thorson v. David H. Schwarz
is whether a petitioner, reincarcerated for a parole violation, is entitled to claim sentence credit for time
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16706 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 86
body was "not sufficient to corroborate Bannister's confession claiming to have given morphine pills
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29557 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. John C. Setagord
.2d at 125. We did not decide the validity of that claim because the trial court had not attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8543 - 2017-09-19

Go America L.L.C. v. Kwik Trip, Inc.
court’s summary judgment dismissing their claims that Kwik Trip, Inc., violated Wisconsin’s Unfair Sales
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24867 - 2006-05-30

[PDF] Wisconsin Central Limited v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
amounts not paid by July 1, 1994. All claims were either decided against the railroads on summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15032 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James C. Lindsey
Lindsey's claim that § 939.62(2m)(b), STATS., violates the prohibitions against cruel and unusual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10075 - 2017-09-19