Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5651 - 5660 of 35996 for affidavit of mailing.
Search results 5651 - 5660 of 35996 for affidavit of mailing.
COURT OF APPEALS
error and indicated the mapping error had been remedied. In September, the Town of Nasewaupee mailed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93405 - 2013-03-04
error and indicated the mapping error had been remedied. In September, the Town of Nasewaupee mailed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93405 - 2013-03-04
Allen Pautsch v. Phillip Kingston
court. We decline to decide the case on this ground because the “mail-box” rule may potentially apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5524 - 2005-03-31
court. We decline to decide the case on this ground because the “mail-box” rule may potentially apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5524 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joan Schmitz
directly, indirectly, by telephone or mail or through other individuals.” The bond order contained similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16324 - 2005-03-31
directly, indirectly, by telephone or mail or through other individuals.” The bond order contained similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16324 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, “I had mailed in a not guilty plea received June 2, 2006 and assumed it had been docketed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27870 - 2014-09-15
, “I had mailed in a not guilty plea received June 2, 2006 and assumed it had been docketed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27870 - 2014-09-15
State v. Stephen Toliver
recent motion and the accompanying affidavits. The circuit court did so despite the fact that Stephen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3011 - 2005-03-31
recent motion and the accompanying affidavits. The circuit court did so despite the fact that Stephen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3011 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Clarence argues that the court did not consider all of his affidavits itemizing fees and costs. Finally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559111 - 2022-08-25
, Clarence argues that the court did not consider all of his affidavits itemizing fees and costs. Finally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559111 - 2022-08-25
Internal Operating Procedures
last indigency determination, the court may request that the person complete a new affidavit
/ca/iop/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50229 - 2010-05-17
last indigency determination, the court may request that the person complete a new affidavit
/ca/iop/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50229 - 2010-05-17
COURT OF APPEALS
was initiated on July 7, 2008. ¶3 The Halls did not answer the complaint, nor submit affidavits or other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87675 - 2012-10-01
was initiated on July 7, 2008. ¶3 The Halls did not answer the complaint, nor submit affidavits or other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87675 - 2012-10-01
Ronald McNamara v. Allen C. Balsiger
an affidavit of Robert Whitemore, an expert witness retained by the McNamaras, because his affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5291 - 2005-03-31
an affidavit of Robert Whitemore, an expert witness retained by the McNamaras, because his affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5291 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the minimum mandatory penalty for second offense OWI. He submitted an affidavit in which he averred that had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100936 - 2013-08-20
of the minimum mandatory penalty for second offense OWI. He submitted an affidavit in which he averred that had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100936 - 2013-08-20