Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5651 - 5660 of 30120 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5651 - 5660 of 30120 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
were alleged in the motion is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion presents
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226402 - 2018-11-01
were alleged in the motion is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion presents
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226402 - 2018-11-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviews de novo.” Id. The Board’s findings will be upheld if they are supported by “any reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673448 - 2023-07-05
reviews de novo.” Id. The Board’s findings will be upheld if they are supported by “any reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673448 - 2023-07-05
State v. Nicole M. Schoepke
to a speedy trial de novo. Id. at 508. ¶3 Schoepke was initially charged with one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6589 - 2005-03-31
to a speedy trial de novo. Id. at 508. ¶3 Schoepke was initially charged with one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6589 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rhonda Neff v. James Pierzina
they are clearly erroneous, but will review de novo whether those findings fulfill a legal standard of prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15421 - 2017-09-21
they are clearly erroneous, but will review de novo whether those findings fulfill a legal standard of prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15421 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was convicted and any read-in crime.” Wis. Stat. § 973.20(1g)(a). We review de novo the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46400 - 2010-01-25
was convicted and any read-in crime.” Wis. Stat. § 973.20(1g)(a). We review de novo the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46400 - 2010-01-25
Susan Bauer v. Village of DeForest
known, warrants a frivolousness determination, is a question of law we review de novo. Stern v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4132 - 2005-03-31
known, warrants a frivolousness determination, is a question of law we review de novo. Stern v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4132 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
App 8, ¶14, 338 Wis. 2d 385, 808 N.W.2d 718 (2011). However, we review de novo the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133096 - 2015-01-20
App 8, ¶14, 338 Wis. 2d 385, 808 N.W.2d 718 (2011). However, we review de novo the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133096 - 2015-01-20
Gordon Graham v. Linda Gerry
). Graham contends that we should review de novo the trial court’s determination that his departure from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15387 - 2005-03-31
). Graham contends that we should review de novo the trial court’s determination that his departure from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15387 - 2005-03-31
Rhonda Neff v. James Pierzina
erroneous, but will review de novo whether those findings fulfill a legal standard of prejudice. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15421 - 2005-03-31
erroneous, but will review de novo whether those findings fulfill a legal standard of prejudice. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15421 - 2005-03-31
Lisa Aumann v. Patricia Anderson
decide de novo. Id. at 172-73. ¶7 The Andersons never accepted the Aumanns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7461 - 2005-03-31
decide de novo. Id. at 172-73. ¶7 The Andersons never accepted the Aumanns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7461 - 2005-03-31