Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5651 - 5660 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5651 - 5660 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
an error was harmless presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Carnemolla, 229 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56128 - 2010-11-02
an error was harmless presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Carnemolla, 229 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56128 - 2010-11-02
State v. Bradley Cornelius
of statutory interpretation, which this court decides de novo. Doyen, 185 Wis.2d at 640, 518 N.W.2d at 323
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13551 - 2005-03-31
of statutory interpretation, which this court decides de novo. Doyen, 185 Wis.2d at 640, 518 N.W.2d at 323
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13551 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rhonda Neff v. James Pierzina
they are clearly erroneous, but will review de novo whether those findings fulfill a legal standard of prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15421 - 2017-09-21
they are clearly erroneous, but will review de novo whether those findings fulfill a legal standard of prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15421 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is procedurally barred from filing a postconviction motion is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912407 - 2025-02-11
is procedurally barred from filing a postconviction motion is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912407 - 2025-02-11
Weber Leicht Gohr & Associates v. Bank One
judgment; rather, we independently apply the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., to the record de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13152 - 2005-03-31
judgment; rather, we independently apply the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., to the record de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13152 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Waukesha v. Gene W. Squire
meet this standard is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 54. ¶6 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3549 - 2017-09-19
meet this standard is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 54. ¶6 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3549 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 1. This court reviews de novo whether the defendant has met that burden. State v. Coolidge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208937 - 2018-02-27
N.W.2d 1. This court reviews de novo whether the defendant has met that burden. State v. Coolidge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208937 - 2018-02-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo the application of those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86350 - 2014-09-15
factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo the application of those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86350 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43, 675
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142813 - 2015-06-03
de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43, 675
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142813 - 2015-06-03
COURT OF APPEALS
the clearly erroneous standard. Id. Second, we apply de novo review to the application of those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73219 - 2011-11-08
the clearly erroneous standard. Id. Second, we apply de novo review to the application of those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73219 - 2011-11-08