Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5651 - 5660 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 5651 - 5660 of 24568 for extending.
City of Eau Claire v. Christopher A. Jerram
authority to dismiss the City’s case. A court’s inherent powers extend only so far as necessary to enable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20984 - 2006-01-17
authority to dismiss the City’s case. A court’s inherent powers extend only so far as necessary to enable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20984 - 2006-01-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
without prejudice, and extend the time for Hill to file a postconviction motion or notice of appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=500487 - 2022-03-29
without prejudice, and extend the time for Hill to file a postconviction motion or notice of appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=500487 - 2022-03-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision. The circuit court informed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186552 - 2017-09-21
years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision. The circuit court informed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186552 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Morgan to two years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision on the burglary count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95632 - 2014-09-15
Morgan to two years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision on the burglary count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95632 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision. The conviction resulted in the revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91922 - 2013-01-22
’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision. The conviction resulted in the revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91922 - 2013-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
imposed a sentence of fourteen years’ initial confinement and nine years’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35789 - 2009-03-09
imposed a sentence of fourteen years’ initial confinement and nine years’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35789 - 2009-03-09
COURT OF APPEALS
confinement and extended supervision. Emond was released to extended supervision, but his supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40991 - 2009-09-21
confinement and extended supervision. Emond was released to extended supervision, but his supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40991 - 2009-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
then sentenced Kind to the maximum term of five years of initial confinement and five years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103479 - 2017-09-21
then sentenced Kind to the maximum term of five years of initial confinement and five years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103479 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement and 12 years of extended supervision. The court also ordered restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146250 - 2015-08-11
years of initial confinement and 12 years of extended supervision. The court also ordered restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146250 - 2015-08-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
imposed terms of seven years and six months of initial confinement followed by five years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907084 - 2025-01-28
imposed terms of seven years and six months of initial confinement followed by five years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907084 - 2025-01-28