Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56501 - 56510 of 83359 for simple case search.
Search results 56501 - 56510 of 83359 for simple case search.
State v. Christopher J. Klingeisen
he had read the passage that stated that before he met the victims in this case, Klingeisen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4906 - 2005-03-31
he had read the passage that stated that before he met the victims in this case, Klingeisen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4906 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Amany E.
, in the form of the district attorney, be given the ultimate discretion to decide which juvenile cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2244 - 2017-09-19
, in the form of the district attorney, be given the ultimate discretion to decide which juvenile cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2244 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
further alleged that Rivera was previously convicted of possessing a firearm as a felon. The case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821135 - 2024-07-02
further alleged that Rivera was previously convicted of possessing a firearm as a felon. The case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821135 - 2024-07-02
[PDF]
State v. Gary Paul Hetto
, in fact, exist. This court has recognized that, “[w]hile in civil cases parties may seek to impose upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2296 - 2017-09-19
, in fact, exist. This court has recognized that, “[w]hile in civil cases parties may seek to impose upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2296 - 2017-09-19
City of Sturgeon Bay v. Mary P. Finnegan
The Fifth Amendment requires that no person may be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6117 - 2005-03-31
The Fifth Amendment requires that no person may be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6117 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶6 The issue in this case is whether there was reasonable suspicion to believe that Cebula
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29589 - 2007-07-04
). ¶6 The issue in this case is whether there was reasonable suspicion to believe that Cebula
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29589 - 2007-07-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
mother, and the case manager. ¶10 At the conclusion of that hearing, the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283481 - 2020-09-01
mother, and the case manager. ¶10 At the conclusion of that hearing, the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283481 - 2020-09-01
State v. James J. Krispin
facts are undisputed. The present case arose from allegations that Krispin, a supervisor at Burger King
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4293 - 2005-03-31
facts are undisputed. The present case arose from allegations that Krispin, a supervisor at Burger King
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4293 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
party. Humphrey and F & K were briefly brought into the case by SSHD, but were dismissed by stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93349 - 2013-02-25
party. Humphrey and F & K were briefly brought into the case by SSHD, but were dismissed by stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93349 - 2013-02-25
[PDF]
State v. Thomas C. Smith
, provides that a sentence imposed in excess of that authorized by law is void “[i]n any case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4555 - 2017-09-20
, provides that a sentence imposed in excess of that authorized by law is void “[i]n any case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4555 - 2017-09-20