Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56521 - 56530 of 76978 for judgment for u s.
Search results 56521 - 56530 of 76978 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
imposed maximum consecutive sentence[s] on these counts taking into consideration the gravity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=299264 - 2020-10-27
imposed maximum consecutive sentence[s] on these counts taking into consideration the gravity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=299264 - 2020-10-27
[PDF]
State v. Patricia E. K.
version of the statute. The State refers to In re M.D.(S.), 168 Wis. 2d 995, 485 N.W.2d 52 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20695 - 2017-09-21
version of the statute. The State refers to In re M.D.(S.), 168 Wis. 2d 995, 485 N.W.2d 52 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20695 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Martin
., provides: If a court or jury determines that the person who is the subject of a petition under s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12174 - 2017-09-21
., provides: If a court or jury determines that the person who is the subject of a petition under s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12174 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Wells Oswalt
neither a harsh and unconscionable sentence nor a “new factor” that “strike[s] at the very purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10769 - 2017-09-20
neither a harsh and unconscionable sentence nor a “new factor” that “strike[s] at the very purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10769 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: WILLIAM S. POCAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237324 - 2019-03-14
an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: WILLIAM S. POCAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237324 - 2019-03-14
Gregory W. Schaefer v. Barbara Conway
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20047 - 2005-10-25
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20047 - 2005-10-25
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
compensation may be claimed, shall, as provided in s. 102.05, have elected to become subject to the provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30732 - 2007-11-27
compensation may be claimed, shall, as provided in s. 102.05, have elected to become subject to the provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30732 - 2007-11-27
COURT OF APPEALS
and 14 days reconfinement order on ground[s that] the case … is at its expiration date and arises [sic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102702 - 2013-10-07
and 14 days reconfinement order on ground[s that] the case … is at its expiration date and arises [sic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102702 - 2013-10-07
[PDF]
State v. Prentiss M. McKinnie
of violation under s. 943.23 than the one charged. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4489 - 2017-09-19
of violation under s. 943.23 than the one charged. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4489 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
contend, “no specific act of misconduct reflecting on Jerri C[.]’s character for truthfulness was ever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30488 - 2014-09-15
contend, “no specific act of misconduct reflecting on Jerri C[.]’s character for truthfulness was ever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30488 - 2014-09-15