Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56531 - 56540 of 63376 for records.
Search results 56531 - 56540 of 63376 for records.
State v. Gary L. Kluck
of sixteen months aggregate jail time. The sentencing hearing transcript is not part of the appeal record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9519 - 2005-03-31
of sixteen months aggregate jail time. The sentencing hearing transcript is not part of the appeal record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9519 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Adversary Counsel for Jane ¶16 The record does not show that Jane, her paid guardian, or her GAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1068424 - 2026-01-27
. Adversary Counsel for Jane ¶16 The record does not show that Jane, her paid guardian, or her GAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1068424 - 2026-01-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the appellate record that was transmitted to this court. Thus, the facts relayed herein are derived from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000749 - 2025-08-27
in the appellate record that was transmitted to this court. Thus, the facts relayed herein are derived from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000749 - 2025-08-27
[PDF]
Fred Wessel v. Brian Schmidlin
made?” and Wessel responded in the affirmative. Further, the record demonstrates that both Wessel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6914 - 2017-09-20
made?” and Wessel responded in the affirmative. Further, the record demonstrates that both Wessel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6914 - 2017-09-20
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Theodore F. Mazza
that he has no objection to such a requirement. ¶11 After a review of the record we conclude
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16840 - 2005-03-31
that he has no objection to such a requirement. ¶11 After a review of the record we conclude
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16840 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234056 - 2019-02-06
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234056 - 2019-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and that his motion for resentencing was procedurally barred. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645817 - 2023-04-18
, and that his motion for resentencing was procedurally barred. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645817 - 2023-04-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to cause bodily harm. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372687 - 2021-06-02
to cause bodily harm. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372687 - 2021-06-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
that Hoffman’s appeal is moot; nevertheless, our review of the record reveals no error by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61995 - 2014-09-15
that Hoffman’s appeal is moot; nevertheless, our review of the record reveals no error by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61995 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by our independent review of the record of the sentencing hearing. See State v. Travis, 2013 WI 38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129299 - 2017-09-21
by our independent review of the record of the sentencing hearing. See State v. Travis, 2013 WI 38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129299 - 2017-09-21