Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56591 - 56600 of 74898 for public records.
Search results 56591 - 56600 of 74898 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and independently reviewing the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245252 - 2019-08-21
and independently reviewing the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245252 - 2019-08-21
[PDF]
Thomas McPhetridge v. Jon E. Litscher
, according to law, neither arbitrary nor oppressive, and supported by sufficient evidence of record. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4148 - 2017-09-20
, according to law, neither arbitrary nor oppressive, and supported by sufficient evidence of record. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4148 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Copus
” of the second (consecutive) ninety-day sentence. Nothing in the record, however, indicates that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12719 - 2017-09-21
” of the second (consecutive) ninety-day sentence. Nothing in the record, however, indicates that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12719 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Green could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592251 - 2022-11-22
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Green could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592251 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 767.451(1)(a)1. (2023-24).1 Based upon our review of Jennifer’s brief and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001076 - 2025-08-26
. § 767.451(1)(a)1. (2023-24).1 Based upon our review of Jennifer’s brief and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001076 - 2025-08-26
Judith N. Nolan v. John R. Knight
, and a stamp recording the 8:10 a.m., October 15 service date and time. A separate original stamp confirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16292 - 2005-03-31
, and a stamp recording the 8:10 a.m., October 15 service date and time. A separate original stamp confirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16292 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the Richland County Sherriff’s Department. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135025 - 2015-02-10
of the Richland County Sherriff’s Department. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135025 - 2015-02-10
[PDF]
State v. Glen P. Walker
fails to allege sufficient facts or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12515 - 2017-09-21
fails to allege sufficient facts or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12515 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2016AP620-CRNM 2 an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170322 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2016AP620-CRNM 2 an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170322 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Connell Marshall
to the jury—without supporting evidence in the record— that the victim recanted her accusations because she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11002 - 2017-09-19
to the jury—without supporting evidence in the record— that the victim recanted her accusations because she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11002 - 2017-09-19