Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5661 - 5670 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 5661 - 5670 of 12912 for prosecuting.
State v. Karl Meyer
reads Henes to hold that the obstructing statute does not permit a prosecution for obstructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10583 - 2005-03-31
reads Henes to hold that the obstructing statute does not permit a prosecution for obstructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10583 - 2005-03-31
State v. Keith Edward Cooper
a guilty plea for any fair and just reason, unless the prosecution would be substantially prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8217 - 2005-03-31
a guilty plea for any fair and just reason, unless the prosecution would be substantially prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8217 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Hyland
arrest, was not in custody, and was not subject to criminal prosecution. Id. at 10. Any undue delay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5237 - 2017-09-19
arrest, was not in custody, and was not subject to criminal prosecution. Id. at 10. Any undue delay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5237 - 2017-09-19
State v. John R. Martin
. Both appeal no. 96-2420-CR-NM and appeal no. 96-2421-CR-NM arise from cases in which the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11309 - 2005-03-31
. Both appeal no. 96-2420-CR-NM and appeal no. 96-2421-CR-NM arise from cases in which the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11309 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, even though unnecessary to the State’s prosecution of the case. ¶10 The testimony regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104215 - 2013-11-12
, even though unnecessary to the State’s prosecution of the case. ¶10 The testimony regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104215 - 2013-11-12
[PDF]
State v. Donald F. Sheffey
evidence in support of his claim of vindictive prosecution. He brought a motion to dismiss before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24910 - 2017-09-21
evidence in support of his claim of vindictive prosecution. He brought a motion to dismiss before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24910 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas J. Fink
and the administrator in the investigation, prosecution and disposition of grievances and complaints filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16443 - 2017-09-21
and the administrator in the investigation, prosecution and disposition of grievances and complaints filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16443 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ruling and denied the motion to exclude the evidence. It concluded that the prosecution would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76796 - 2014-09-15
ruling and denied the motion to exclude the evidence. It concluded that the prosecution would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76796 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
factors, like Vang’s remorse and his cooperation with the prosecution, and aggravating factors, like
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108096 - 2014-02-11
factors, like Vang’s remorse and his cooperation with the prosecution, and aggravating factors, like
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108096 - 2014-02-11
[PDF]
State v. Jerry P. Dowdley
and that the State would inform the sentencing court of Bush's cooperation with regard to Dowdley's prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8015 - 2017-09-19
and that the State would inform the sentencing court of Bush's cooperation with regard to Dowdley's prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8015 - 2017-09-19