Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5661 - 5670 of 46746 for show's.
Search results 5661 - 5670 of 46746 for show's.
State v. Juan Smith
. 2d 591, 614 N.W.2d 11 (citation omitted). “A defendant’s failure to make a satisfactory showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3209 - 2005-03-31
. 2d 591, 614 N.W.2d 11 (citation omitted). “A defendant’s failure to make a satisfactory showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3209 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
showed up at her house, pointed a black-and-silver handgun at her, and demanded the bag of money. DK
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257706 - 2020-04-15
showed up at her house, pointed a black-and-silver handgun at her, and demanded the bag of money. DK
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257706 - 2020-04-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the defendant must show that counsel’s actions or omissions “fell below an objective standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362766 - 2021-05-04
, the defendant must show that counsel’s actions or omissions “fell below an objective standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362766 - 2021-05-04
State v. Edron D. Broomfield
. To satisfy the prejudice prong, the defendant usually must show that “counsel’s errors were serious enough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12116 - 2005-03-31
. To satisfy the prejudice prong, the defendant usually must show that “counsel’s errors were serious enough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12116 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
avoid this procedural bar by showing that he or she had a “sufficient reason” for failing to raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102261 - 2017-09-21
avoid this procedural bar by showing that he or she had a “sufficient reason” for failing to raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102261 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
computer.” The form contains several fact statements that can be indicated with an “X” to show why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138978 - 2017-09-21
computer.” The form contains several fact statements that can be indicated with an “X” to show why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138978 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
daylight and is in color, shows a red Monte Carlo pulling up to the side of the street. Moss, wearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479163 - 2022-02-01
daylight and is in color, shows a red Monte Carlo pulling up to the side of the street. Moss, wearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479163 - 2022-02-01
[PDF]
State v. Samuel Nelis
). If a defendant can show “that the state knew of a specific date in time, but purposely did not allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25040 - 2017-09-21
). If a defendant can show “that the state knew of a specific date in time, but purposely did not allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25040 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert J. Flores
for his arrest and detention. It next ruled he failed to make a sufficient preliminary showing that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19485 - 2005-09-06
for his arrest and detention. It next ruled he failed to make a sufficient preliminary showing that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19485 - 2005-09-06
[PDF]
WI APP 117
that he got “a document” from the store employee whose cell phone the gunman took that “show[ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102930 - 2017-09-21
that he got “a document” from the store employee whose cell phone the gunman took that “show[ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102930 - 2017-09-21