Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5661 - 5670 of 46921 for show's.
Search results 5661 - 5670 of 46921 for show's.
[PDF]
Dane County v. Kenneth R. McGrew
on a miscarriage of justice, a defendant must show that there is a “‘substantial degree of probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6648 - 2017-09-20
on a miscarriage of justice, a defendant must show that there is a “‘substantial degree of probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6648 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
showing. See State v. Avery, 213 Wis. 2d 228, 237-41, 570 N.W.2d 573 (Ct. App. 1997), abrogated on other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35012 - 2014-09-15
showing. See State v. Avery, 213 Wis. 2d 228, 237-41, 570 N.W.2d 573 (Ct. App. 1997), abrogated on other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35012 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
whether the defendant has met their burden to show a violation of the requirement that the jury pool
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=879523 - 2024-11-21
whether the defendant has met their burden to show a violation of the requirement that the jury pool
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=879523 - 2024-11-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence. 2 Because Adams does not show that plea withdrawal is warranted or that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118163 - 2014-09-15
sentence. 2 Because Adams does not show that plea withdrawal is warranted or that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118163 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
for the first time in court, the in-court identifications constituted an improper “show- up” under State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27467 - 2014-09-15
for the first time in court, the in-court identifications constituted an improper “show- up” under State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27467 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment motion.2 I conclude that: (1) C.C. has failed to show that there is a genuine issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263244 - 2020-06-04
judgment motion.2 I conclude that: (1) C.C. has failed to show that there is a genuine issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263244 - 2020-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, a defendant must show that counsel’s actions or omissions were “professionally unreasonable.” See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186951 - 2017-09-21
, a defendant must show that counsel’s actions or omissions were “professionally unreasonable.” See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186951 - 2017-09-21
State v. James P. Henderson
, 181 (1986). To prove deficient performance, a defendant must show specific acts or omissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2249 - 2005-03-31
, 181 (1986). To prove deficient performance, a defendant must show specific acts or omissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2249 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the defendant must show that counsel’s actions or omissions “fell below an objective standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362766 - 2021-05-04
, the defendant must show that counsel’s actions or omissions “fell below an objective standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362766 - 2021-05-04
[PDF]
State v. Agustin Velez
conclusively shows that the defendant is not entitled to relief, the court may exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11315 - 2017-09-19
conclusively shows that the defendant is not entitled to relief, the court may exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11315 - 2017-09-19