Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56611 - 56620 of 64843 for timed.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not. Davison, 263 Wis. 2d 145, ¶22. Charged offenses are different in fact if they are separated in time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817982 - 2024-06-25

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the no-merit report, dismiss this appeal without prejudice, and extend the time for Carter to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863177 - 2024-10-14

CA Blank Order
. Viera and his cousin forcibly, repeatedly, and at times simultaneously sexually assaulted a sixteen-year
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110011 - 2014-04-08

[PDF] State v. John M. Shelley
and is not dependent upon such factors as whether the accused recants within a ‘reasonable time ….’” Rydeski, slip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12637 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael Gisvold
knowledge at the time of the arrest would lead a reasonable police officer to believe … that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13451 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are not persuaded that the one-time use of the word “gimmick” in the context of the total trial was so significant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130721 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
in the judgment that Lopez pay child support without credit for placement time.[7] Lopez also signed a temporary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73910 - 2011-11-14

State v. Joseph J.J.
, in response to the State's mistrial motion, Joseph's counsel stated: [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: My belief at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10814 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to address whether a defendant could withdraw a plea because the defendant was not advised at the time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219635 - 2018-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 05, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
at the time, did not require suppression of the defendant’s statements. The court explained that Innis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27317 - 2006-12-04