Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5671 - 5680 of 16449 for commentating.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that he has “struggled with alcohol and drugs,” and the court commented upon Hooker’s three prior OWI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105609 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
entry from June 3, 2015 that states, “Court has Jurisdiction” and “Comment: Section 808.04(8) applied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164060 - 2017-09-21

State v. John Casteel
them without comment on their merits. We see no reason to overrule that decision. The trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14221 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Richard T. Harder
sentencing comments show that the circuit court considered all the appropriate factors, but placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5405 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Town of Grand Chute v. Mark Harry Gabriel
" and the court properly reminded him that the closing arguments are to comment on the evidence, not to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12629 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] William D. Purdy and Lisa Purdy v. Federated Mutual Insurance Company
), in which the supreme court, in another context, commented that primary and excess insurers do not cover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8633 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2013AP2490-CR 2 comments and mischaracterizes the law regarding proper consideration of lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123121 - 2017-09-21

State v. Charles R. Wincek
. The trial court’s comments at sentencing plainly indicate that the court believed that some time served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10692 - 2005-03-31

State v. John Casteel
them without comment on their merits. We see no reason to overrule that decision. The trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14220 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
than any comments by his attorney at sentencing. IT IS ORDERED that the judgment and order appealed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207057 - 2018-01-11