Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5671 - 5680 of 68274 for did.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
guilty did not relate to what occurred in Bivens’s car. When the trial court asked about relying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174413 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and did not violate his rights under the Confrontation Clause. Accordingly, we reject Pearson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640910 - 2023-04-04

COURT OF APPEALS
her how this made her feel and she said: “[h]e did stuff like that quite often, so I wasn’t afraid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143066 - 2015-06-15

State v. Thomas J. Paters
of the summaries did not deny Paters his constitutional right of confrontation and there was sufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9500 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
and mailed the itemization request to the Walkers on December 18, 2014. The Walkers never responded nor did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146953 - 2015-08-25

[PDF] State v. Justin F. W.
did not have a blanket policy for denying requests for delays because one request had already been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9003 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
he was prejudiced by the State’s discovery violation. He also argues that he did not knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68848 - 2014-09-15

Monroe County Department of Human Services v. Maureen J.
denied the request, concluding that the privilege did not apply. During trial, Maureen requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12678 - 2005-03-31

WI App 150 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP310-CR Complete Title...
did testify at trial, though. Prior to any criminal charges being filed, Adamczak sought the help
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103832 - 2013-12-17

COURT OF APPEALS
is not in the hall when other students are passing between classes. Because the school district did not follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68667 - 2011-07-27