Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5671 - 5680 of 50071 for our.
Search results 5671 - 5680 of 50071 for our.
State v. Marvin D. Doyle
challenging his counsel's analysis of the issues and raising additional issues. Upon our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9464 - 2005-03-31
challenging his counsel's analysis of the issues and raising additional issues. Upon our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9464 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Nothing in our current review of the record undermines our confidence in those No. 2014AP1841
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165699 - 2017-09-21
. Nothing in our current review of the record undermines our confidence in those No. 2014AP1841
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165699 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-28, 416 N.W.2d 627 (Ct. App. 1987). With regard to the circuit court’s sentencing decision, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719352 - 2023-10-24
-28, 416 N.W.2d 627 (Ct. App. 1987). With regard to the circuit court’s sentencing decision, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719352 - 2023-10-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the misstatement in the colloquy as harmless error. However, this characterization is of no consequence to our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619815 - 2023-02-14
the misstatement in the colloquy as harmless error. However, this characterization is of no consequence to our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619815 - 2023-02-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of discretionary reversal under WIS. No. 2016AP792 2 STAT. § 752.35 (2015-16). 1 Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209012 - 2018-02-26
of discretionary reversal under WIS. No. 2016AP792 2 STAT. § 752.35 (2015-16). 1 Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209012 - 2018-02-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Prior to trial, our supreme court decided Thompson. In that case, a previous foreclosure action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251183 - 2019-12-12
Prior to trial, our supreme court decided Thompson. In that case, a previous foreclosure action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251183 - 2019-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Our review of a decision in a certiorari action is limited to whether the decision was within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163897 - 2017-09-21
Our review of a decision in a certiorari action is limited to whether the decision was within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163897 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and an order No. 2017AP237-CR 2 denying his motion for resentencing. 1 Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204999 - 2017-12-13
, and an order No. 2017AP237-CR 2 denying his motion for resentencing. 1 Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204999 - 2017-12-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103691 - 2017-09-21
was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103691 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court erred in denying the remaining claims in Agnew’s postconviction motion. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757254 - 2024-01-30
court erred in denying the remaining claims in Agnew’s postconviction motion. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757254 - 2024-01-30