Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56721 - 56730 of 74898 for public records.
Search results 56721 - 56730 of 74898 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
opportunity to observe the driver. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude No. 2012AP289-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102036 - 2017-09-21
opportunity to observe the driver. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude No. 2012AP289-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102036 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to support issuance of the injunction. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=584871 - 2022-11-01
to support issuance of the injunction. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=584871 - 2022-11-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071113 - 2026-02-03
of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071113 - 2026-02-03
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110006 - 2014-04-03
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110006 - 2014-04-03
State v. Peter Bekersky
, and that the record contained no other evidence that Bekersky had consistently maintained his innocence. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7779 - 2005-03-31
, and that the record contained no other evidence that Bekersky had consistently maintained his innocence. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7779 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of justice. After review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992307 - 2025-08-06
of justice. After review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992307 - 2025-08-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and after conducting an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539134 - 2022-07-06
, and after conducting an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539134 - 2022-07-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that denied her motion for relief from a judgment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976202 - 2025-07-01
that denied her motion for relief from a judgment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976202 - 2025-07-01
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[t]his is not a new factor claim,” and that the record does not support his position. Batson appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33531 - 2008-07-29
that “[t]his is not a new factor claim,” and that the record does not support his position. Batson appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33531 - 2008-07-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brown filed a response. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631927 - 2023-03-15
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brown filed a response. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631927 - 2023-03-15