Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56771 - 56780 of 83673 for case search.
Search results 56771 - 56780 of 83673 for case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168990 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168990 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tavares James Rosemond
in this case showed that he moved the victim between three and twenty-eight feet. He further argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21564 - 2017-09-21
in this case showed that he moved the victim between three and twenty-eight feet. He further argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21564 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court noted that D.H. had no new referrals since the case began ten months earlier and that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539127 - 2022-07-06
. The circuit court noted that D.H. had no new referrals since the case began ten months earlier and that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539127 - 2022-07-06
State v. Richard A. Hallada
of a given case is a question of law that we review independently. State v. Kaisan, 207 Wis. 2d 611, 621
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21435 - 2006-02-21
of a given case is a question of law that we review independently. State v. Kaisan, 207 Wis. 2d 611, 621
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21435 - 2006-02-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the family court, in that case, properly interpreted the statutory presumption, the question remaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35484 - 2009-02-10
the family court, in that case, properly interpreted the statutory presumption, the question remaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35484 - 2009-02-10
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131447 - 2014-12-09
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131447 - 2014-12-09
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110873 - 2014-04-29
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110873 - 2014-04-29
State v. John N. Mccoy
he understood the charges in relation to the facts of his case. Although the motion was initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8946 - 2005-03-31
he understood the charges in relation to the facts of his case. Although the motion was initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8946 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=658219 - 2023-05-24
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=658219 - 2023-05-24
[PDF]
WI APP 101
2013 WI APP 101 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP2184
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99436 - 2017-09-21
2013 WI APP 101 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP2184
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99436 - 2017-09-21