Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5681 - 5690 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5681 - 5690 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. An appellate court reviews legal issues de novo, meaning without any deference to the circuit court. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228718 - 2018-11-26
. An appellate court reviews legal issues de novo, meaning without any deference to the circuit court. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228718 - 2018-11-26
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72525 - 2011-10-19
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72525 - 2011-10-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81993 - 2014-09-15
court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81993 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court. This court reviews a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Mach v. Allison, 2003 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172934 - 2017-09-21
court. This court reviews a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Mach v. Allison, 2003 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172934 - 2017-09-21
State v. William A. Brown
de novo. State v. Delaney, 2003 WI 9, ¶12, 259 Wis. 2d 77, 658 N.W.2d 416. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6513 - 2005-03-31
de novo. State v. Delaney, 2003 WI 9, ¶12, 259 Wis. 2d 77, 658 N.W.2d 416. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6513 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas L. Leck
the application of a constitutional standard to undisputed facts, which we review de novo. State v. Riddle, 192
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10119 - 2005-03-31
the application of a constitutional standard to undisputed facts, which we review de novo. State v. Riddle, 192
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10119 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts and conduct a de novo review of whether there was reasonable suspicion. Id. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62225 - 2011-04-05
the facts and conduct a de novo review of whether there was reasonable suspicion. Id. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62225 - 2011-04-05
State v. Randall R. Rosenbaum
probable cause is solely a question of law that we review de novo. State v. King, 175 Wis.2d 146, 150, 499
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13939 - 2005-03-31
probable cause is solely a question of law that we review de novo. State v. King, 175 Wis.2d 146, 150, 499
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13939 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerold L. Rober
and denial of the motion. We conclude, therefore, that the error is de minimis.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21028 - 2006-01-23
and denial of the motion. We conclude, therefore, that the error is de minimis.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21028 - 2006-01-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997). ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57518 - 2014-09-15
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997). ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57518 - 2014-09-15