Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5681 - 5690 of 49813 for our.
Search results 5681 - 5690 of 49813 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193800 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193800 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
relief. We stayed transmittal of the record to our court pending the conclusion of circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33850 - 2008-08-27
relief. We stayed transmittal of the record to our court pending the conclusion of circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33850 - 2008-08-27
2006 WI 122
. We remand to the court of appeals for reconsideration in light of our decision and the request
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27087 - 2006-11-08
. We remand to the court of appeals for reconsideration in light of our decision and the request
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27087 - 2006-11-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253861 - 2020-02-11
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253861 - 2020-02-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the records, we conclude that no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218892 - 2018-09-07
. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the records, we conclude that no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218892 - 2018-09-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we may not substitute our judgment for that of the jury “unless the evidence, viewed most favorably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247675 - 2019-10-02
, we may not substitute our judgment for that of the jury “unless the evidence, viewed most favorably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247675 - 2019-10-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report is whether the circuit court erred when accepting Smith’s pleas. Our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747657 - 2024-01-09
report is whether the circuit court erred when accepting Smith’s pleas. Our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747657 - 2024-01-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of discretionary reversal under WIS. No. 2016AP792 2 STAT. § 752.35 (2015-16). 1 Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209012 - 2018-02-26
of discretionary reversal under WIS. No. 2016AP792 2 STAT. § 752.35 (2015-16). 1 Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209012 - 2018-02-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire and waiver of rights form and plea hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279090 - 2020-08-18
. Our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire and waiver of rights form and plea hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279090 - 2020-08-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Our review of a decision in a certiorari action is limited to whether the decision was within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163897 - 2017-09-21
Our review of a decision in a certiorari action is limited to whether the decision was within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163897 - 2017-09-21