Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56821 - 56830 of 64778 for b's.
Search results 56821 - 56830 of 64778 for b's.
COURT OF APPEALS
independently of the trial court. Id. at 128. B. Failure to Mention Informal Agreement ¶35 Yunck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53429 - 2010-08-16
independently of the trial court. Id. at 128. B. Failure to Mention Informal Agreement ¶35 Yunck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53429 - 2010-08-16
[PDF]
State v. Bobby D. Salas
) and 973.01(2)(b) (1999-2000). Even more importantly, the challenged statement was made in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7212 - 2017-09-20
) and 973.01(2)(b) (1999-2000). Even more importantly, the challenged statement was made in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7212 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and as a result, we reject this basis for relief. b. Counsel’s failure to introduce evidence that the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806115 - 2024-05-29
, and as a result, we reject this basis for relief. b. Counsel’s failure to introduce evidence that the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806115 - 2024-05-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
these findings. Therefore, we can only conclude that counsel did not perform deficiently. B. Trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=587768 - 2022-11-08
these findings. Therefore, we can only conclude that counsel did not perform deficiently. B. Trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=587768 - 2022-11-08
WI App 61 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1350 Complete Title of...
, or possess program benefits.” See id., 2012 WI App 32, ¶20 (citing 7 USC § 2015(b)); see also Black’s Law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81419 - 2013-04-29
, or possess program benefits.” See id., 2012 WI App 32, ¶20 (citing 7 USC § 2015(b)); see also Black’s Law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81419 - 2013-04-29
State v. Charles J. Hajicek
is “[a]ny item whose possession is forbidden by law.” Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 328.16(1)(b). Section 961.41(3g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14870 - 2005-03-31
is “[a]ny item whose possession is forbidden by law.” Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 328.16(1)(b). Section 961.41(3g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14870 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James W. Foseid v. State Bank of Cross Plains
)) (internal quoted source omitted) (emphasis added); see § 805.14(5)(b), STATS. (judgment notwithstanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7798 - 2017-09-19
)) (internal quoted source omitted) (emphasis added); see § 805.14(5)(b), STATS. (judgment notwithstanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7798 - 2017-09-19
State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
arrest.[8] B. Eluding Minniecheske also contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14119 - 2005-03-31
arrest.[8] B. Eluding Minniecheske also contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14119 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Stephanie Roberts v. Robby Joseph Roberts
. See WIS. STAT. § 901.03(1)(b). No. 04-1645 16 ¶34 We also reject Robby’s contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7568 - 2017-09-19
. See WIS. STAT. § 901.03(1)(b). No. 04-1645 16 ¶34 We also reject Robby’s contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7568 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
LaPean for a Class B felony that carries a maximum penalty of sixty years’ imprisonment. These remarks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269016 - 2020-07-14
LaPean for a Class B felony that carries a maximum penalty of sixty years’ imprisonment. These remarks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269016 - 2020-07-14