Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56851 - 56860 of 77279 for j o e y s.
Search results 56851 - 56860 of 77279 for j o e y s.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. EUGENE E. DUNAGAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52945 - 2014-09-15
. EUGENE E. DUNAGAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52945 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
is deferential. “[W]e start with the presumption that the circuit court acted reasonably.” State v. Lechner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34278 - 2008-10-14
is deferential. “[W]e start with the presumption that the circuit court acted reasonably.” State v. Lechner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34278 - 2008-10-14
State v. Anthony Kane
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: joseph e. wimmer, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, P.J., Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15092 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: joseph e. wimmer, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, P.J., Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15092 - 2005-03-31
State v. Armando M. Tia
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8102 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8102 - 2005-03-31
Nicholas Christman v. Michael Galanton
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: bruce e. schroeder, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6105 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: bruce e. schroeder, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6105 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 16 (Ct. App. 1995) (“[W]e may affirm on grounds different than those relied on by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115232 - 2014-06-23
N.W.2d 16 (Ct. App. 1995) (“[W]e may affirm on grounds different than those relied on by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115232 - 2014-06-23
[PDF]
State v. Dave Burton
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Oneida County: ROBERT E. KINNEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10965 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Oneida County: ROBERT E. KINNEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10965 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
seized presents a question of constitutional fact. Young, 294 Wis. 2d 1, ¶17. “[W]e accept
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343880 - 2021-03-09
seized presents a question of constitutional fact. Young, 294 Wis. 2d 1, ¶17. “[W]e accept
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343880 - 2021-03-09
[PDF]
Carl Edward Rucker v. Jewel Food Store
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: LEE E. WELLS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7180 - 2017-09-20
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: LEE E. WELLS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7180 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
544, 787 N.W.2d 350. There is, however, a limitation, because “[w]e need finality
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012102 - 2025-09-23
544, 787 N.W.2d 350. There is, however, a limitation, because “[w]e need finality
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012102 - 2025-09-23