Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56851 - 56860 of 82996 for simple case search.
Search results 56851 - 56860 of 82996 for simple case search.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
brief and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970255 - 2025-06-18
brief and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970255 - 2025-06-18
[PDF]
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195593 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195593 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision, to be served consecutively to time he was serving on another case. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289457 - 2020-09-22
of extended supervision, to be served consecutively to time he was serving on another case. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289457 - 2020-09-22
[PDF]
Luetzow Industries v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. In a previous judgment in this case, the trial court reversed No. 94-3398 -2- the Commission's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8431 - 2017-09-19
. In a previous judgment in this case, the trial court reversed No. 94-3398 -2- the Commission's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8431 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). Keith’s current claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144241 - 2015-07-06
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). Keith’s current claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144241 - 2015-07-06
George Huxhold v. John Joseph Campbell
in this section].” The clear intent of this language is to require the disclosure in every case, and to prohibit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6618 - 2005-03-31
in this section].” The clear intent of this language is to require the disclosure in every case, and to prohibit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6618 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2019-20).1 We further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501423 - 2022-03-31
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2019-20).1 We further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501423 - 2022-03-31
[PDF]
WI 78
at issue is consistent with controlling case law, the language, as drafted, is potentially confusing
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84593 - 2014-09-15
at issue is consistent with controlling case law, the language, as drafted, is potentially confusing
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84593 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 15, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
, 364, 521 N.W.2d 444 (Ct. App. 1994). In this case, the oral pronouncement was granting summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27140 - 2006-11-14
, 364, 521 N.W.2d 444 (Ct. App. 1994). In this case, the oral pronouncement was granting summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27140 - 2006-11-14
Ryan A. v. Wright C. Laufenberg
to terminate his parental rights, the order of dismissal is affirmed. This case arises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9407 - 2005-03-31
to terminate his parental rights, the order of dismissal is affirmed. This case arises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9407 - 2005-03-31