Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56861 - 56870 of 64743 for b's.

[PDF] WI APP 109
. Van Hollen, attorney general and Juan B. Colas, assistant attorney general. There was oral argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32971 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] City of Pewaukee v. Thomas L. Carter
(Ct. App. 1996). 10 Meyer, 229 Wis. 2d at 817. No. 03-1114 7 B ¶16 Defining
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16780 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 32
. Covelli and Andrew B. Hebl of Boardman, Suhr, Curry & Field LLP, Madison, and Jeffrey J. Gilson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60328 - 2014-09-15

State v. Ronald L. Ragan
] B. Closing Arguments Ragan next contends that trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10347 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
or a member of a three-judge panel may be cited for its persuasive value. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=552097 - 2022-08-09

[PDF] WI APP 59
of the facts in the record.” Id. B. WISCONSIN STAT. § 907.02(1) and the Daubert Admissibility Standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145375 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
with the use of a dangerous weapon, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.01(1)(a) & 939.63(1)(b) (2009‑10).[1] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111593 - 2014-05-05

[PDF] WI APP 120
. B. Factual basis. ¶19 As we have seen, this was a plea-bargained case where the State permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101643 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reject Buckner’s facial equal protection challenge to WIS. STAT. § 48.685(5)(br). B. As Applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116170 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Jardines, 569 U.S. at 6-7. B. Step 2 of the community caretaker test ¶17 The second step requires us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257980 - 2020-04-14