Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56871 - 56880 of 74892 for public records.

State v. Kenneth D. Paulson
. The court then recited the offenses listed in the complaint, which Paulson acknowledged on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14598 - 2005-03-31

State v. Charles Brown
. At the plea hearing, Brown’s counsel explained the purposes of the plea agreement on the record: What we have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7011 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, counsel’s additional response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344172 - 2021-03-10

[PDF] State v. James Sanicki, Jr.
review of the record, however, we conclude that the original postconviction motion was necessarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3808 - 2017-09-20

State v. Alphonso Hubanks
facts that would support an argument that the lineup was suggestive. In addition, the record suggests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13266 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
not respond. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112086 - 2014-05-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the standard for dangerousness required to continue his NGI commitment. We conclude that the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741731 - 2023-12-19

COURT OF APPEALS
). Rather, we must examine the record for any credible and substantial evidence that supports the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35129 - 2009-01-07

CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144245 - 2015-07-06

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Stephenie Ann T.H.
. ¶7 Extraneous information is information that is neither of record nor within the jurors’ general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6155 - 2017-09-19