Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56891 - 56900 of 61811 for judgment.
Search results 56891 - 56900 of 61811 for judgment.
COURT OF APPEALS
Ray, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33828 - 2008-08-25
Ray, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33828 - 2008-08-25
WI App 123 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case...
, or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment”; and (4) the evidence might reasonably call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87966 - 2012-11-28
, or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment”; and (4) the evidence might reasonably call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87966 - 2012-11-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for summary judgment and objection to Breitenbach’s motion for dismissal.3 Relevant here, Morgan argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919313 - 2025-02-27
for summary judgment and objection to Breitenbach’s motion for dismissal.3 Relevant here, Morgan argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919313 - 2025-02-27
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
October 17, 2023, this court concluded it lacked jurisdiction to review two judgments of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923140 - 2025-03-05
October 17, 2023, this court concluded it lacked jurisdiction to review two judgments of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923140 - 2025-03-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
county. IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed under WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108969 - 2017-09-21
county. IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed under WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108969 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appealed the denial of his postconviction motion. We affirmed the judgment and order. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=200272 - 2017-10-31
appealed the denial of his postconviction motion. We affirmed the judgment and order. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=200272 - 2017-10-31
[PDF]
WI APP 197
the portion of the judgment relating to overtime costs. By order dated October 9, 2003, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26528 - 2014-09-15
the portion of the judgment relating to overtime costs. By order dated October 9, 2003, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26528 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ryan E. Brockman
in pertinent part: [A]n appeal may be taken by the state from any ... (d) Order or judgment the substantive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9285 - 2005-03-31
in pertinent part: [A]n appeal may be taken by the state from any ... (d) Order or judgment the substantive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9285 - 2005-03-31
Phaedra P. v. Dennis A.
and was adjudicated Kaitlin’s father in May 2001 in Kenosha county, Wisconsin. The paternity judgment granted joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7165 - 2005-03-31
and was adjudicated Kaitlin’s father in May 2001 in Kenosha county, Wisconsin. The paternity judgment granted joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7165 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Karl Julius James v. Gary R. McCaughtry
or unreasonable and represented his will and not his judgment, and whether the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12811 - 2017-09-21
or unreasonable and represented his will and not his judgment, and whether the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12811 - 2017-09-21