Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5691 - 5700 of 63654 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 5691 - 5700 of 63654 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
division of marital property. After hearing the motion, the circuit court ordered that the lien docket
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20104 - 2014-09-15
division of marital property. After hearing the motion, the circuit court ordered that the lien docket
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20104 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Amanda Reich, “was a fit and proper person to have the care and custody of the Child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88872 - 2014-09-15
, Amanda Reich, “was a fit and proper person to have the care and custody of the Child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88872 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
unless otherwise noted. No. 2008AP2493-CR 2 court erroneously denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35890 - 2014-09-15
unless otherwise noted. No. 2008AP2493-CR 2 court erroneously denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35890 - 2014-09-15
Thomas J. McPhetridge, Sr. v. Christine A. McPhetridge
residence awarded to him by the divorce court in its division of marital property. After hearing the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20104 - 2007-06-04
residence awarded to him by the divorce court in its division of marital property. After hearing the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20104 - 2007-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence because he was under arrest before probable cause existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35890 - 2009-03-16
erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence because he was under arrest before probable cause existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35890 - 2009-03-16
State v. John G. Anderson
safety as a repeater, and an order denying his motion for a new trial. He argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16301 - 2005-03-31
safety as a repeater, and an order denying his motion for a new trial. He argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16301 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the care and custody of the Child,” and it was in the child’s best interests that Reich be granted sole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88872 - 2012-11-05
the care and custody of the Child,” and it was in the child’s best interests that Reich be granted sole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88872 - 2012-11-05
Mark Anthony Adell v. Judy Smith
standard that is applied when considering a motion to dismiss in an ordinary civil case for “[f]ailure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2126 - 2005-03-31
standard that is applied when considering a motion to dismiss in an ordinary civil case for “[f]ailure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2126 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 149
. § 948.02(2), and interference with child custody, see Wis. Stat. § 948.31(2). The judgments were dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34086 - 2008-10-26
. § 948.02(2), and interference with child custody, see Wis. Stat. § 948.31(2). The judgments were dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34086 - 2008-10-26
[PDF]
Mark Anthony Adell v. Judy Smith
a claim is the same standard that is applied when considering a motion to dismiss in an ordinary civil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2126 - 2017-09-19
a claim is the same standard that is applied when considering a motion to dismiss in an ordinary civil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2126 - 2017-09-19