Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5691 - 5700 of 84703 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 5691 - 5700 of 84703 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The Honorable David L. Borowski presided over the plea and sentencing hearings in this case. The Honorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016379 - 2025-09-30
The Honorable David L. Borowski presided over the plea and sentencing hearings in this case. The Honorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016379 - 2025-09-30
State v. Cain Wiskow
suppression motion because a warrantless search of his room violated his Fourth Amendment rights. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3949 - 2005-03-31
suppression motion because a warrantless search of his room violated his Fourth Amendment rights. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3949 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
a protective search for weapons in a particular case. (Quotations and citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53160 - 2014-09-15
a protective search for weapons in a particular case. (Quotations and citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53160 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a protective search for weapons in a particular case. (Quotations and citations omitted.) ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53160 - 2010-08-09
a protective search for weapons in a particular case. (Quotations and citations omitted.) ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53160 - 2010-08-09
State v. Gerald D. Barr
to the officer’s search, thereby purging the taint of any unlawful curtilage entry, and because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6566 - 2005-03-31
to the officer’s search, thereby purging the taint of any unlawful curtilage entry, and because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6566 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
on the evidence obtained through the execution of a search warrant at Selk’s apartment. Selk moved to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133828 - 2015-01-28
on the evidence obtained through the execution of a search warrant at Selk’s apartment. Selk moved to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133828 - 2015-01-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the execution of a search warrant at Selk’s apartment. Selk moved to suppress the evidence on grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133828 - 2017-09-21
the execution of a search warrant at Selk’s apartment. Selk moved to suppress the evidence on grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133828 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steven G. Loveday
in not granting his motion to suppress evidence.[1] I. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11407 - 2005-03-31
in not granting his motion to suppress evidence.[1] I. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11407 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Edward Garrett
2001 WI App 240 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-3183-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3307 - 2017-09-19
2001 WI App 240 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-3183-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3307 - 2017-09-19
State v. Edward Garrett
2001 WI App 240 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-3183-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3307 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 240 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-3183-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3307 - 2005-03-31