Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56901 - 56910 of 61722 for judgment.
Search results 56901 - 56910 of 61722 for judgment.
COURT OF APPEALS
a court to relieve a party from a judgment, order, or stipulation if the movant makes a proper showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35260 - 2009-01-20
a court to relieve a party from a judgment, order, or stipulation if the movant makes a proper showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35260 - 2009-01-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109725 - 2017-09-21
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109725 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James H.
), which provides: “Except as provided in sub. (2m) or (2r), if the court revises a judgment or order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4965 - 2017-09-19
), which provides: “Except as provided in sub. (2m) or (2r), if the court revises a judgment or order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4965 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Warren L. Brandt
Jenkins subsequently granted summary judgment in favor of the OLR with respect to several counts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16633 - 2017-09-21
Jenkins subsequently granted summary judgment in favor of the OLR with respect to several counts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16633 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Karen A.O.
in the answers to all questions which are necessary to support a judgment." Fleischacker v. State Farm Mut'l
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9932 - 2017-09-19
in the answers to all questions which are necessary to support a judgment." Fleischacker v. State Farm Mut'l
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9932 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Mario Deluca v. Town of Vernon
action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8912 - 2017-09-19
action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8912 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Urlene Lilly v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
credibility. Although we agree that this court must defer to DHSS credibility judgments, given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8906 - 2017-09-19
credibility. Although we agree that this court must defer to DHSS credibility judgments, given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8906 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are generally disfavored because “they disrupt the finality of prior judgments and thereby tend to undermine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93293 - 2014-09-15
are generally disfavored because “they disrupt the finality of prior judgments and thereby tend to undermine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93293 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented the DHA’s will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364322 - 2021-05-11
was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented the DHA’s will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364322 - 2021-05-11
[PDF]
Michele A. Meurer v. Chad Wm. Meurer
awarded to Chad. Although neither party was ordered to pay child support, the judgment indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6499 - 2017-09-19
awarded to Chad. Although neither party was ordered to pay child support, the judgment indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6499 - 2017-09-19