Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56901 - 56910 of 78645 for restraining orders.

[PDF] Public Reprimand With Consent - Daniel A. Enright
in the criminal case had ordered the client’s ex-husband to pay restitution in the amount of $7,690, plus a $769
/services/public/lawyerreg/statuspublic/enright.pdf - 2022-04-18

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
also received 5 petitions for supervisory writ, which ask the Supreme Court to order the Court
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33309 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Motion to File Amicus-Non-Party Brief (Whitford et al.)
. Wis. Elections Comm’n, Order No. 2021AP1450-OA, 1–3, Oct. 14, 2021). In support of their motion
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/motionamicuswhitford.pdf - 2021-10-25

[PDF] SC Clerk-Ltr
for supervisory writ, which ask the Supreme Court to order the Court of Appeals or a circuit court to take
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215357 - 2018-07-06

[PDF] Monthly Statistical Report - June 2018
for supervisory writ, which ask the Supreme Court to order the Court of Appeals or a circuit court to take
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215357 - 2018-07-06

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27421 - 2006-12-13

Village of Germantown v. Harold T. Doeg
ordered food, but did not eat much of it, and then went to his car, turned the lights on and off, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6092 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gene Renzoni
from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Racine County: dennis j. barry, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3072 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JEFFREY A. WAGNER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098064 - 2026-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Warren L. Brandt
of this disciplinary proceeding is an appropriate discipline for his professional misconduct. ¶15 IT IS ORDERED
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16633 - 2005-03-31