Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56921 - 56930 of 83455 for simple case search.
Search results 56921 - 56930 of 83455 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
. This court must consider the nature of the State’s case, the defense presented at trial and the connection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32755 - 2008-05-19
. This court must consider the nature of the State’s case, the defense presented at trial and the connection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32755 - 2008-05-19
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137519 - 2015-03-11
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137519 - 2015-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
and denied the motion. The case went to trial before a jury and Mills was convicted of his second offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42813 - 2009-11-03
and denied the motion. The case went to trial before a jury and Mills was convicted of his second offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42813 - 2009-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
claim and no indication the Langreders would file one. Standard of Review ¶10 In this case, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27054 - 2006-11-06
claim and no indication the Langreders would file one. Standard of Review ¶10 In this case, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27054 - 2006-11-06
Carol Gonzales v. Kenosha County
, the plaintiffs agreed to dismiss the case. Some of the plaintiffs (now the appellants), objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20892 - 2006-01-10
, the plaintiffs agreed to dismiss the case. Some of the plaintiffs (now the appellants), objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20892 - 2006-01-10
[PDF]
State v. Johnnie Hunter
his motion for 126 days credit against his nine month sentences. Hunter first cites case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8345 - 2017-09-19
his motion for 126 days credit against his nine month sentences. Hunter first cites case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8345 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Johnnie Hunter
his motion for 126 days credit against his nine month sentences. Hunter first cites case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8346 - 2017-09-19
his motion for 126 days credit against his nine month sentences. Hunter first cites case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8346 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the case, alleging a speedy trial violation. The trial court denied the motion, granted the adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104346 - 2013-11-19
the case, alleging a speedy trial violation. The trial court denied the motion, granted the adjournment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104346 - 2013-11-19
[PDF]
Rule Order
, that the fee at issue is not imposed in such cases. The court discussed whether to conduct a public hearing
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115257 - 2017-09-21
, that the fee at issue is not imposed in such cases. The court discussed whether to conduct a public hearing
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115257 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case No. 2020AP1049-CR 2 is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379291 - 2021-06-23
that this case No. 2020AP1049-CR 2 is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379291 - 2021-06-23