Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56971 - 56980 of 64735 for b's.
Search results 56971 - 56980 of 64735 for b's.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
court did not err in refusing to suppress the heroin. B. ¶15 Lewer claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27555 - 2006-12-26
court did not err in refusing to suppress the heroin. B. ¶15 Lewer claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27555 - 2006-12-26
[PDF]
Adolph F. Cebula v. Thomas Cotter
the Cebulas from presenting expert testimony. See WIS. STAT. § 802.06(2)(b) & (3) (“[I]f … matters outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2635 - 2017-09-19
the Cebulas from presenting expert testimony. See WIS. STAT. § 802.06(2)(b) & (3) (“[I]f … matters outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2635 - 2017-09-19
Diane Marie Biever v. Nicholas Joseph Biever
. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] In a subsequent order on reconsideration, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15117 - 2005-03-31
. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] In a subsequent order on reconsideration, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15117 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jeanne M. Lindskog v. Ronald P. Lindskog
will not be published. See RULE 809.23(1)(b)5, STATS. OpinionCaseNumber 2014-09-15T17:26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14264 - 2014-09-15
will not be published. See RULE 809.23(1)(b)5, STATS. OpinionCaseNumber 2014-09-15T17:26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14264 - 2014-09-15
State v. Christopher K. Engles
. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15813 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15813 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kristen K. Cleaver
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5. AppealNo AddtlCap Panel2 2017-09
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20061 - 2017-09-21
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5. AppealNo AddtlCap Panel2 2017-09
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20061 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
imprisonment term of twelve years and six months for a Class F felony); and 973.01(2)(b)6m. and (d)4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103519 - 2013-10-23
imprisonment term of twelve years and six months for a Class F felony); and 973.01(2)(b)6m. and (d)4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103519 - 2013-10-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
.—Orders affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56323 - 2014-09-15
.—Orders affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56323 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
fifteen years); 939.32(1m)(b) (applicable maximum term of extended supervision is one-half
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=520864 - 2022-05-17
fifteen years); 939.32(1m)(b) (applicable maximum term of extended supervision is one-half
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=520864 - 2022-05-17
[PDF]
Dean Snodgrass v. David H. Schwarz
was contrary to the purposes of probation. “[B]efore revoking probation, there should be an exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7205 - 2017-09-20
was contrary to the purposes of probation. “[B]efore revoking probation, there should be an exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7205 - 2017-09-20