Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 56971 - 56980 of 74892 for public records.

[PDF] State v. Russell Stokes
is supported by the record, and therefore, defense counsel’s performance was not deficient. To establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9219 - 2017-09-19

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Stephenie Ann T.H.
Extraneous information is information that is neither of record nor within the jurors’ general knowledge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6156 - 2005-03-31

State v. Abdullah Refeeq Beyah
). The only evidence in the record supporting coercive conduct by the police is Beyah's testimony. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10432 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Lynn Morrissey
the client's former wife that the satisfaction would not be recorded until the $60,000 check had been sent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16836 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
record, that he would become a proper subject for commitment if treatment were withdrawn.” The doctor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593401 - 2022-11-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to process” that was not supported by evidence in the record. ¶5 In response, the State argues first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264840 - 2020-06-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, including the transcript of the jury trial, we conclude that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131836 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
The record indicates that the defense intended to call Bergevain as a witness.[1] So as to catch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87126 - 2012-09-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=908197 - 2025-02-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to respond and he has responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191341 - 2017-09-21