Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 571 - 580 of 30059 for de.
Search results 571 - 580 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
Riviera Airport, Inc. v. Pierce County Board of Adjustment
remanded the case to the board and ordered it to conduct a de novo review of the zoning committee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14310 - 2014-09-15
remanded the case to the board and ordered it to conduct a de novo review of the zoning committee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14310 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Statutes are to the 2019-20 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2019AP1253 3 de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393466 - 2021-07-20
Statutes are to the 2019-20 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2019AP1253 3 de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393466 - 2021-07-20
COURT OF APPEALS
for summary judgment. Lacy demanded a de novo proceeding before the circuit court. The circuit court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32407 - 2008-04-09
for summary judgment. Lacy demanded a de novo proceeding before the circuit court. The circuit court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32407 - 2008-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=560883 - 2022-08-30
from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=560883 - 2022-08-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon which the 2019 permit was issued. See WIS. STAT. § 62.23(7)(de)4. (“Once granted, a conditional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783285 - 2024-04-03
upon which the 2019 permit was issued. See WIS. STAT. § 62.23(7)(de)4. (“Once granted, a conditional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783285 - 2024-04-03
[PDF]
James Logic v. City of South Milwaukee Board of Canvassers
court dismissed Logic’s appeal. Our review is de novo. See Burnett v. Hill, 207 Wis. 2d 110, 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7567 - 2017-09-19
court dismissed Logic’s appeal. Our review is de novo. See Burnett v. Hill, 207 Wis. 2d 110, 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7567 - 2017-09-19
MEE Bellevue, LLC v. Winnebago County
Wis. 2d 883, 653 N.W.2d 309 (despite de novo review, we benefit from the circuit court’s analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6764 - 2005-03-31
Wis. 2d 883, 653 N.W.2d 309 (despite de novo review, we benefit from the circuit court’s analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6764 - 2005-03-31
Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire
(1), questions of law we review de novo. DOR v. Mark, 168 Wis. 2d 288, 291, 483 N.W.2d 302 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2560 - 2005-03-31
(1), questions of law we review de novo. DOR v. Mark, 168 Wis. 2d 288, 291, 483 N.W.2d 302 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2560 - 2005-03-31
State v. David A. Krier
of these issues are questions of law and therefore subject to de novo review. See State v. Williams, 104 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14912 - 2005-03-31
of these issues are questions of law and therefore subject to de novo review. See State v. Williams, 104 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14912 - 2005-03-31
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. City of Milwaukee
interpretation and application to a set of undisputed facts, which also commands our de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8663 - 2005-03-31
interpretation and application to a set of undisputed facts, which also commands our de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8663 - 2005-03-31