Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 571 - 580 of 29714 for des.
Search results 571 - 580 of 29714 for des.
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. City of Milwaukee
interpretation and application to a set of undisputed facts, which also commands our de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8663 - 2005-03-31
interpretation and application to a set of undisputed facts, which also commands our de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8663 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB #318 6650 W. State St. Wauwatosa, WI 53213
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171584 - 2017-09-21
Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB #318 6650 W. State St. Wauwatosa, WI 53213
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171584 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Howard R. Wagner v. County of Burnett
de novo, deciding whether the requirements for intervention have been met without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13468 - 2017-09-21
de novo, deciding whether the requirements for intervention have been met without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13468 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James Logic v. City of South Milwaukee Board of Canvassers
court dismissed Logic’s appeal. Our review is de novo. See Burnett v. Hill, 207 Wis. 2d 110, 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7567 - 2017-09-19
court dismissed Logic’s appeal. Our review is de novo. See Burnett v. Hill, 207 Wis. 2d 110, 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7567 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire
), questions of law we review de novo. DOR v. Mark, 168 Wis. 2d 288, 291, 483 N.W.2d 302 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2560 - 2017-09-19
), questions of law we review de novo. DOR v. Mark, 168 Wis. 2d 288, 291, 483 N.W.2d 302 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2560 - 2017-09-19
Howard R. Wagner v. County of Burnett
to intervene de novo, deciding whether the requirements for intervention have been met without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13468 - 2005-03-31
to intervene de novo, deciding whether the requirements for intervention have been met without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13468 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In March 2022, after a hearing de novo, the circuit court denied Ryan’s motion to modify legal custody
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872502 - 2024-11-07
. In March 2022, after a hearing de novo, the circuit court denied Ryan’s motion to modify legal custody
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872502 - 2024-11-07
George J. and Mary V. Capoun Revocable Trust v. Aftab Ansari
review de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See Smith v. Dodgeville Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15456 - 2005-03-31
review de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See Smith v. Dodgeville Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15456 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State of Wisconsin-Department of Corrections v. David H. Schwarz
). ¶6 “Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo, and as such, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6714 - 2017-09-20
). ¶6 “Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo, and as such, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6714 - 2017-09-20
State of Wisconsin-Department of Corrections v. David H. Schwarz
interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo, and as such, we are not bound by an agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6714 - 2005-03-31
interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo, and as such, we are not bound by an agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6714 - 2005-03-31