Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 571 - 580 of 29821 for des.
Search results 571 - 580 of 29821 for des.
James Logic v. City of South Milwaukee Board of Canvassers
dismissed Logic’s appeal. Our review is de novo. See Burnett v. Hill, 207 Wis. 2d 110, 118, 557 N.W.2d 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7567 - 2005-03-31
dismissed Logic’s appeal. Our review is de novo. See Burnett v. Hill, 207 Wis. 2d 110, 118, 557 N.W.2d 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7567 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon which the 2019 permit was issued. See WIS. STAT. § 62.23(7)(de)4. (“Once granted, a conditional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783285 - 2024-04-03
upon which the 2019 permit was issued. See WIS. STAT. § 62.23(7)(de)4. (“Once granted, a conditional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783285 - 2024-04-03
John F. Hernandez v. Patrick E. Behrndt
Behrndt appeals from a judgment of the circuit court dismissing his demand for a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3515 - 2005-03-31
Behrndt appeals from a judgment of the circuit court dismissing his demand for a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3515 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire
), questions of law we review de novo. DOR v. Mark, 168 Wis. 2d 288, 291, 483 N.W.2d 302 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2560 - 2017-09-19
), questions of law we review de novo. DOR v. Mark, 168 Wis. 2d 288, 291, 483 N.W.2d 302 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2560 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB #318 6650 W. State St. Wauwatosa, WI 53213
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171584 - 2017-09-21
Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB #318 6650 W. State St. Wauwatosa, WI 53213
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171584 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In March 2022, after a hearing de novo, the circuit court denied Ryan’s motion to modify legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872502 - 2024-11-07
. In March 2022, after a hearing de novo, the circuit court denied Ryan’s motion to modify legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872502 - 2024-11-07
State v. David A. Krier
of these issues are questions of law and therefore subject to de novo review. See State v. Williams, 104 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14912 - 2005-03-31
of these issues are questions of law and therefore subject to de novo review. See State v. Williams, 104 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14912 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James Logic v. City of South Milwaukee Board of Canvassers
court dismissed Logic’s appeal. Our review is de novo. See Burnett v. Hill, 207 Wis. 2d 110, 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7567 - 2017-09-19
court dismissed Logic’s appeal. Our review is de novo. See Burnett v. Hill, 207 Wis. 2d 110, 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7567 - 2017-09-19
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. City of Milwaukee
interpretation and application to a set of undisputed facts, which also commands our de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8663 - 2005-03-31
interpretation and application to a set of undisputed facts, which also commands our de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8663 - 2005-03-31
George J. and Mary V. Capoun Revocable Trust v. Aftab Ansari
review de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See Smith v. Dodgeville Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15456 - 2005-03-31
review de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See Smith v. Dodgeville Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15456 - 2005-03-31