Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5701 - 5710 of 69092 for he.

COURT OF APPEALS
the travel restriction sua sponte and, as a result, he had no meaningful notice of the restriction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142942 - 2015-06-10

[PDF] State v. Paul Wozniak
analysis he used in this case. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND On October 6, 1995, the State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11773 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Dennis P. Smith
offense. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Smith claims that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19393 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a little strange” with Decker in late October 2021, and in December he “started initiating some text
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745622 - 2023-12-28

[PDF] NOTICE
“pee-pee.” He also testified that he had seen Jacob do the same to Jacob, Jr. ¶3 Cynthia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45233 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
was empaneled, defense counsel advised that Servantez would stipulate that he knew he was revoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40458 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
that Servantez would stipulate that he knew he was revoked. This discussion followed: MR. SISLEY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40458 - 2009-09-08

COURT OF APPEALS
pull down Charlie’s pants and touch his “pee-pee.” He also testified that he had seen Jacob do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45233 - 2010-01-05

State v. Carl C. Martin
on September 25, 1988. He was charged with trespass and fourth-degree sexual assault on similar facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7949 - 2005-03-31

State v. Paul Wozniak
in formulating and applying the risk factor analysis he used in this case. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11773 - 2011-09-27