Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5701 - 5710 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 5701 - 5710 of 12912 for prosecuting.
CA Blank Order
sex, he forfeited his right to claim error on the prosecution’s further exploration along the same
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105214 - 2013-12-10
sex, he forfeited his right to claim error on the prosecution’s further exploration along the same
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105214 - 2013-12-10
State v. Kevin L. Guibord
argues that the prosecution of both charges violates double jeopardy because OWI under § 346.63(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10360 - 2005-03-31
argues that the prosecution of both charges violates double jeopardy because OWI under § 346.63(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10360 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cheryl C. Britton
in these prosecutions. The officers complied with their promise not to arrest Britton, however, and she and Thaiss were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11173 - 2005-03-31
in these prosecutions. The officers complied with their promise not to arrest Britton, however, and she and Thaiss were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11173 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to enter no contest pleas, but the prosecution objected and the circuit court rejected that attempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29775 - 2007-07-23
to enter no contest pleas, but the prosecution objected and the circuit court rejected that attempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29775 - 2007-07-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court properly considered Roberson’s failure to cooperate with the State’s prosecution of his co
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528111 - 2022-06-07
the circuit court properly considered Roberson’s failure to cooperate with the State’s prosecution of his co
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528111 - 2022-06-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of judgment in exchange for Wangerin’s cooperation in the investigation and prosecution of a person who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923479 - 2025-03-06
of judgment in exchange for Wangerin’s cooperation in the investigation and prosecution of a person who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923479 - 2025-03-06
COURT OF APPEALS
for failing to impeach the credibility of another prosecution witness. This court rejected Segner’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57175 - 2010-12-01
for failing to impeach the credibility of another prosecution witness. This court rejected Segner’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57175 - 2010-12-01
COURT OF APPEALS
of the prosecution witnesses. The testimony of those witnesses was consistent and there was no reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36684 - 2009-06-08
of the prosecution witnesses. The testimony of those witnesses was consistent and there was no reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36684 - 2009-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS
attorney to prosecute the matter. However, this response misses the broader point of Colby. The reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98123 - 2013-06-12
attorney to prosecute the matter. However, this response misses the broader point of Colby. The reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98123 - 2013-06-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
in a civil suit may provide grounds for subsequent criminal prosecution. We see no reason why evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51329 - 2014-09-15
in a civil suit may provide grounds for subsequent criminal prosecution. We see no reason why evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51329 - 2014-09-15