Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 57041 - 57050 of 83414 for simple case search.
Search results 57041 - 57050 of 83414 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Stephen E. Lee
, and the State negotiated a plea agreement which resolved the case. Lee has provided only a partial transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5946 - 2017-09-19
, and the State negotiated a plea agreement which resolved the case. Lee has provided only a partial transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5946 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
in this case. Fortier saves a case from Tillman only if there is a “joint breakdown” in the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51951 - 2014-09-15
in this case. Fortier saves a case from Tillman only if there is a “joint breakdown” in the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51951 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Rule Order
) Section 968.26(5): determine whether a John Doe case should be extended beyond the statutory time
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=895719 - 2024-12-26
) Section 968.26(5): determine whether a John Doe case should be extended beyond the statutory time
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=895719 - 2024-12-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm. In 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811975 - 2024-06-12
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm. In 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811975 - 2024-06-12
[PDF]
State v. Andre Bolden
2003 WI App 155 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-2974-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5858 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 155 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-2974-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5858 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698571 - 2023-09-06
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698571 - 2023-09-06
CA Blank Order
) Before Lundsten, Higginbotham and Kloppenburg, JJ. Prior to sentencing in this case, Sarah Nelson paid
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143245 - 2015-06-15
) Before Lundsten, Higginbotham and Kloppenburg, JJ. Prior to sentencing in this case, Sarah Nelson paid
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143245 - 2015-06-15
COURT OF APPEALS
157 (1994), because they could have been raised previously. Edwards responds that a different case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75605 - 2011-12-27
157 (1994), because they could have been raised previously. Edwards responds that a different case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75605 - 2011-12-27
State v. Freeman Canady
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-1457-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15597 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-1457-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15597 - 2005-03-31
State v. Francisco Hernandez-Rosas
or implied charge against the declarant of recent fabrication or improper influence or motive. This case had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6251 - 2005-03-31
or implied charge against the declarant of recent fabrication or improper influence or motive. This case had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6251 - 2005-03-31