Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5711 - 5720 of 16449 for commentating.
Search results 5711 - 5720 of 16449 for commentating.
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court’s comments at the sentencing hearing demonstrate it believed the guidelines were meaningless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93402 - 2013-03-04
. The court’s comments at the sentencing hearing demonstrate it believed the guidelines were meaningless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93402 - 2013-03-04
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing comments show that it did not misunderstand the difference between a mandatory release date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96439 - 2013-05-06
sentencing comments show that it did not misunderstand the difference between a mandatory release date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96439 - 2013-05-06
State v. Jurgen Brinkman
scenario clearly indicates that Brinkman did, indeed, make a “request.” Although his initial comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10392 - 2005-03-31
scenario clearly indicates that Brinkman did, indeed, make a “request.” Although his initial comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10392 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel L. Nelson
Nelson’s sentence to comport with the law and the court’s comments at the original sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20890 - 2006-01-09
Nelson’s sentence to comport with the law and the court’s comments at the original sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20890 - 2006-01-09
State v. Laron J. Williamson
hearing, the court commented that the legislature considered this to be a very serious offense because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4488 - 2005-03-31
hearing, the court commented that the legislature considered this to be a very serious offense because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4488 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
spin on the court’s comments and mischaracterizes the law regarding proper consideration of lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123121 - 2014-10-06
spin on the court’s comments and mischaracterizes the law regarding proper consideration of lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123121 - 2014-10-06
State v. Carl Mitchell
comments during sentencing and our deference to the trial court, see id. at 183, 233 N.W.2d at 460, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9744 - 2005-03-31
comments during sentencing and our deference to the trial court, see id. at 183, 233 N.W.2d at 460, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9744 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court’s comments did not indicate that the length of the sentence imposed was based on the assumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93681 - 2013-03-04
. The court’s comments did not indicate that the length of the sentence imposed was based on the assumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93681 - 2013-03-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
arguable merit. The record shows that Thurmond was afforded the opportunity to comment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592796 - 2022-11-22
arguable merit. The record shows that Thurmond was afforded the opportunity to comment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592796 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
Adrian Lomax v. Warden
comment that Luedtke killed Rode was not disrespect, but oral criticism of staff. We disagree. While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9081 - 2017-09-19
comment that Luedtke killed Rode was not disrespect, but oral criticism of staff. We disagree. While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9081 - 2017-09-19