Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5711 - 5720 of 50070 for our.
Search results 5711 - 5720 of 50070 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial counsel was constitutionally defective for failing to object to the breach. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182419 - 2017-09-21
trial counsel was constitutionally defective for failing to object to the breach. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182419 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was advised of his right to file a response to the no-merit report, but he has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578584 - 2022-10-18
was advised of his right to file a response to the no-merit report, but he has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578584 - 2022-10-18
State v. Joseph L. O'Day
Consent Law. After analyzing the Neville decision, our supreme court held that the United States Supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14930 - 2005-03-31
Consent Law. After analyzing the Neville decision, our supreme court held that the United States Supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14930 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
grounds supporting Condon’s plea withdrawal. Based on our independent review, we agree with appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97638 - 2013-06-04
grounds supporting Condon’s plea withdrawal. Based on our independent review, we agree with appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97638 - 2013-06-04
[PDF]
Columbia County v. Tyler C. Schleicher
that we should exercise our discretion and decline to invoke the guilty-plea-waiver rule, a doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3464 - 2017-09-20
that we should exercise our discretion and decline to invoke the guilty-plea-waiver rule, a doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3464 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on remand, the court asked that we reconsider our acceptance of the State’s concession that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253589 - 2020-02-06
on remand, the court asked that we reconsider our acceptance of the State’s concession that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253589 - 2020-02-06
CA Blank Order
which relief may be granted. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115301 - 2014-06-19
which relief may be granted. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115301 - 2014-06-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253861 - 2020-02-11
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253861 - 2020-02-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon consideration of the report, Banister’s response, and our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246519 - 2019-09-11
a response. Upon consideration of the report, Banister’s response, and our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246519 - 2019-09-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
additional facts relevant to these issues as necessary in our discussion below. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93609 - 2014-09-15
additional facts relevant to these issues as necessary in our discussion below. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93609 - 2014-09-15