Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5711 - 5720 of 50070 for our.
Search results 5711 - 5720 of 50070 for our.
[PDF]
Columbia County v. Tyler C. Schleicher
that we should exercise our discretion and decline to invoke the guilty-plea-waiver rule, a doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3464 - 2017-09-20
that we should exercise our discretion and decline to invoke the guilty-plea-waiver rule, a doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3464 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on remand, the court asked that we reconsider our acceptance of the State’s concession that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253589 - 2020-02-06
on remand, the court asked that we reconsider our acceptance of the State’s concession that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253589 - 2020-02-06
CA Blank Order
which relief may be granted. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115301 - 2014-06-19
which relief may be granted. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115301 - 2014-06-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253861 - 2020-02-11
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253861 - 2020-02-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon consideration of the report, Banister’s response, and our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246519 - 2019-09-11
a response. Upon consideration of the report, Banister’s response, and our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246519 - 2019-09-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
additional facts relevant to these issues as necessary in our discussion below. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93609 - 2014-09-15
additional facts relevant to these issues as necessary in our discussion below. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93609 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
report and our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146175 - 2015-08-18
report and our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146175 - 2015-08-18
CA Blank Order
., 222 Wis. 2d 384, 389, 588 N.W.2d 67 (Ct. App. 1998). Our review of the record persuades us
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136865 - 2015-03-10
., 222 Wis. 2d 384, 389, 588 N.W.2d 67 (Ct. App. 1998). Our review of the record persuades us
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136865 - 2015-03-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his postconviction motion.1 Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=340556 - 2021-03-03
his postconviction motion.1 Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=340556 - 2021-03-03
State v. Carlos Lucho Phillips
that this possible issue lacks merit. Based upon our independent review of the record, including the letter, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7963 - 2005-03-31
that this possible issue lacks merit. Based upon our independent review of the record, including the letter, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7963 - 2005-03-31