Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5711 - 5720 of 64449 for records/1000.
Search results 5711 - 5720 of 64449 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
response, and we have independently reviewed the record. We conclude that no arguably meritorious issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108370 - 2017-09-21
response, and we have independently reviewed the record. We conclude that no arguably meritorious issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108370 - 2017-09-21
State v. Antonio McAfee
on record facts and law which precluded a verdict of acquittal. Second, he argues that trial counsel failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18213 - 2005-05-23
on record facts and law which precluded a verdict of acquittal. Second, he argues that trial counsel failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18213 - 2005-05-23
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, and has responded. We have independently reviewed the Record, the response, and the no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000743 - 2025-08-27
, and has responded. We have independently reviewed the Record, the response, and the no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000743 - 2025-08-27
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
not responded. Upon reviewing the entire Record and the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1083398 - 2026-03-04
not responded. Upon reviewing the entire Record and the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1083398 - 2026-03-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record, the no-merit report, the response, and the supplemental report, as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745628 - 2023-12-28
the record, the no-merit report, the response, and the supplemental report, as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745628 - 2023-12-28
Winnebago County v. Paul M. Nigl
record; second, if we were to construe his petition as a direct appeal, he is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6651 - 2005-03-31
record; second, if we were to construe his petition as a direct appeal, he is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6651 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the State’s recommendation. This no-merit appeal follows. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111964 - 2017-09-21
with the State’s recommendation. This no-merit appeal follows. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111964 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707798 - 2023-09-28
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707798 - 2023-09-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) motion for summary judgment. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138247 - 2017-09-21
) motion for summary judgment. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138247 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James D.B.
the $25 annual fee. ¶4 The trial court’s order must be reversed because nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15914 - 2017-09-21
the $25 annual fee. ¶4 The trial court’s order must be reversed because nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15914 - 2017-09-21